Searches of MKs' homes regulated

By DAN IZENBERG
February 6, 2006 23:20
1 minute read.
mazuz 88

mazuz 88. (photo credit: )

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user uxperience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew, Ivrit
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Repor
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

Last July 3, in the wake of a legal dispute over whether police could search the house of Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's son, Gilad, when Sharon himself lived in the same house, Attorney-General Menahem Mazuz issued a guideline on the subject, which also applies to the current case of Likud MK Inbal Gavrieli. The guideline addressed the question of when does an MK's immunity against a police search of his home apply in a case where the police want to search the home in connection with an investigation over someone else living in it who is not an MK. In Gavrieli's case, the police wanted to search for material connected to the investigation of her father, Shoni Gavrieli. According to Mazuz's guideline, each case must be investigated according to its own particular circumstances because of the different variables that must be taken into consideration. For example, for parliamentary immunity to apply, it must be certain that the house the police want to search is the one in which the MK is actually living - not one the MK owns but rents to someone else. Secondly, the police may search the property of an MK if they can isolate the part of it in which they want to conduct the search and leave the MK's abode untouched. This would apply in cases where, for example, the police want to search a structure located on the property, but one that is separate from the home of the MK, or if the home is divided into separate wings. If the home is one, organic whole, the police may not search it. Mazuz added that in "borderline cases," where there is good cause to believe that the immunity of the MK could be lifted (at which point the MK's home could be searched), the police may take into consideration the potential impact of the search in determining the outcome of the investigation in order to decide whether to conduct the search in the MK's home. Mazuz added that in any case in which the police want to search a property linked to an MK, they must first obtain the approval of the attorney-general. Furthermore, the search warrant must be approved by the court.

Related Content

Jisr az-Zarq
April 3, 2014
Residents of Jisr az-Zarqa beckon Israel Trail hikers to enjoy their town

By SHARON UDASIN