Sharon's unilateral disengagement from the Likud

Sharon vowed Monday that, if he were re-elected prime minister, there would be no more unilateral withdrawals.

By GIL STERN STERN HOFFMAN
November 22, 2005 00:35
2 minute read.

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

Prime Minister Ariel Sharon vowed on Monday that, if he were re-elected prime minister, there would be no more unilateral withdrawals. But that didn't stop him from embarking on his plan to unilaterally disengage from the Likud. Sharon blamed his departure from the Likud on his political opponents, who he suggested would stymie his future diplomatic initiatives. He neglected to shoulder any of the blame for the split in the party. A major reason for the breakup is that Sharon likes to act alone. He consults with many people but ultimately makes all his decisions by himself. As a soldier, Sharon gained a reputation for ignoring the orders of his superiors and devising his own military strategy. The same approach that Sharon used on military battlefields in the Suez Canal and Lebanon he now employs on the diplomatic and political battlefields. Sharon exploited the lack of a Palestinian partner to withdraw unilaterally from the Gaza Strip on his own terms. Now he is using the behavior of the Likud rebels as an excuse to form a political party where he will be free of the restraints of annoying Likud institutions like its central committee. Once Sharon achieves his political independence, he will likely start working toward achieving diplomatic independence. His advisers have already hinted that if the road map peace plan falls through, Sharon will likely try to draw Israel's borders on his own. The ideal situation for Sharon would be to have a political party with no dissent, like Rabbi Ovadia Yosef in Shas and Yosef Lapid in Shinui, and a world where no country ever pressures Israel and he can draw Israel's borders without having to talk to any Palestinians. The man who redrew Israel's map in the summer single-handedly redrew Israel's political map in the fall. Israel's voters will draw their own conclusions in the spring. They could decide to give Sharon the freedom to decide the country's future. Or they might send Sharon back to the Negev to count his sheep unilaterally on his ranch.

Related Content

Jisr az-Zarq
April 3, 2014
Residents of Jisr az-Zarqa beckon Israel Trail hikers to enjoy their town

By SHARON UDASIN