'State must prepare zoning plan to legalize Derech Ha’avot'

High Court: ‘It is inconceivable that only Jews will be able to build housing.’

April 27, 2010 05:43
3 minute read.
'State must prepare zoning plan to legalize Derech Ha’avot'

Gush Etzion area 224.88. (photo credit: Ariel Jerozolimski)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analysis from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


If the state wants to legalize the buildings in the outpost of Derech Ha’avot, it ought to start drafting a zoning plan for the area so that those who wish to live there may apply for the appropriate building permits, High Court Justice Edmond Levy told the state on Monday.

Levy, along with Justices Edna Arbel and Neal Hendel, was hearing a petition filed by the left-wing Peace Now movement and eight Palestinians from the village of El Khader, demanding that the Civil Administration in Judea and Samaria implement the demolition order it had issued against all 17 permanent and 15 mobile homes in the outpost.

In a response to the petition, filed on Sunday, the state’s representative, attorney Gilad Shirman, said the state intended to conduct a survey of the land on which the houses had been established to determine whether it was state- or Palestinian-owned. Shirman said the survey would be completed by the end of 2010.

But Levy said on Monday that who owned the land was irrelevant for zoning purposes. A zoning plan determined allowed land usage according to planning principles and necessities, he said. After the allowed land usages were determined, said Levy, whoever owned the land would be entitled to build accordingly.

“If the state wants to legalize the buildings, it needs to have a zoning plan first,” Levy told Shirman. “It is inconceivable that only Jews will be able to build housing and that Palestinian land will remain agricultural.”

However, Shirman, without spelling it out, replied that the ownership issue was “relevant” to the question of whether the state would prepare a zoning plan or not. He said the political echelon was unwilling at this time to declare whether it would prepare a zoning plan for the land.

Attorney Michael Sfard, representing the Palestinians, charged that the ownership of the land had everything to do with whether the state would prepare a zoning plan. If the survey determined that the land belonged to Palestinians, he said, the state would not prepare a zoning plan allowing them to build on it.

In any case, he said, the truth was that the state had no intention of conducting a survey and preferred to leave the situation as it was. Even though the petition was filed two years ago, the state had never before mentioned the possibility of a survey, he said.

“All of a sudden, they tell us that they are going to conduct a survey,” he said.

Sfard accused the state of not behaving “honestly and in good faith.”

“They don’t really intend to conduct a survey,” he said. “I’ll tell you why: If they had really intended to do so, they had 10 years to do it [before the petition was filed]. What they really want is to continue to maintain the current situation.”

According to the current situation, the illegal homes are inhabited by the Derech Ha’avot settlers.

In that context, Sfard added that if it wanted to, the state could conduct the survey in a few weeks instead of the eight months it was asking for.

In the meantime, the court granted Sfard’s request for 21 days to reply to other arguments raised by the state in its 40-page response to the petition. In addition to the survey argument, the state added that the civil administration was preoccupied with enforcing the building freeze on West Bank settlements. Shirman provided figures to support the claim. Sfard said he wished to study the figures and present a response to the court.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Jisr az-Zarq
April 3, 2014
Residents of Jisr az-Zarqa beckon Israel Trail hikers to enjoy their town