State requests 30-day breather in religious judges case

Haredi critics claim that haredi judges are less sympathetic to the women and, therefore, less willing to find solutions.

April 16, 2007 23:25
1 minute read.


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analysis from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


In the latest chapter of an ongoing battle between vying religious powers, the State Attorney's Office asked Monday for a 30-day extension to answer four separate High Court petitions against the recent appointment of 15 religious judges. Sharon Rotshenker, deputy state attorney, asked for the extension, citing the recent Pessah holiday as the reason for the delay in responding to the petitions. The Israel Bar Association and a coalition of women's rights' groups petitioned the High Court against the appointments, claiming that a disproportionate number of haredi judges were chosen. But more surprising were the petitions of two Orthodox organizations: Tzohar Rabbis and Emunah, an organization of religious Zionist women. The petitioners claim that Shas, a government coalition member, and United Torah Judaism, who has voiced willingness to support the government on certain issues, have monopolized the appointment process. "Rabbis [Yosef Shalom] Elyashiv and Ovadia [Yosef] are calling the shots," said Sharon Shenhav, the Israel Bar Association's representative on the Committee for the Appointment of Religious Judges. "All the appointments were decided in advance without due diligence, no interviews, no discussions, nothing." Marital law in Israel, where there is no separation between Church and State, is governed by Halacha (Jewish Law). The most sensitive subject dealt with by the religious judges is the plight of agunot, literally chained women. These are women unable to complete the divorce process because their recalcitrant husbands, who are trying to negotiate a more favorable monetary agreement, refuse to provide a divorce writ. Some critics of the haredi appointments claim that haredi judges are less sympathetic to the women and, therefore, less willing to find solutions. However, Rabbi Ya'acov Ariel, Chief Rabbi of Ramat Gan and a leading religious Zionist halachic authority, rejected this criticism, arguing that both haredim and religious Zionists follow the same Halacha. He said it was dangerous to present religious Zionists as "reformers" as it could undermine their authority. Rather, Ariel opposed the appointment process as unfair.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Jisr az-Zarq
April 3, 2014
Residents of Jisr az-Zarqa beckon Israel Trail hikers to enjoy their town


Cookie Settings