State to reconsider cutting electricity and fuel to Gaza

State prosecutor tells High Court that action's effectiveness had been cast in doubt; decision comes after petition forced 3 week delay.

December 19, 2007 22:12
1 minute read.
State to reconsider cutting electricity and fuel to Gaza

gaza fuel cut 224.88. (photo credit: AP [file])


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analysis from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


In response to a petition filed by Palestinians and human rights organizations, the State Attorney's Office informed the High Court of Justice on Wednesday that the government would reconsider its policy of cutting fuel and electricity supplies to the Gaza Strip. According to the state attorney, the government was beginning to doubt the effectiveness of the policy. He said that two years ago an agreement was reached between the electric company and the Palestinian Authority in which it was determined that the electricity supply to Gaza would be reduced by an even higher amount than the proposed sanctions. He added that due to miscommunication, the state was never informed about the deal. However, two of the organizations involved in the petition harshly criticized the state's response. They argued that ever since Israel bombed the power station in Gaza, hospitals in the area have had difficulty functioning, and residents have suffered from a shortage of water. On December 2, petitioners demanded that the High Court intervene in the matter, arguing that sanctions constituted collective punishment, which was against international law. They also charged that they would create severe humanitarian problems such as endangering "the functioning of the hospitals, the water and sewage systems, home medical equipment, refrigeration of food and medicine and other vital systems necessary to safeguard the health of the population." The High Court subsequently ordered the state to postpone their action by three weeks.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Jisr az-Zarq
April 3, 2014
Residents of Jisr az-Zarqa beckon Israel Trail hikers to enjoy their town


Cookie Settings