Steinitz: No deal was made over yeshiva stipends

Finance Minister denies claims by Eli Yishai that he made a backroom agreement; Yishai: There were talks, but clause was removed after debate.

By REBECCA ANNA STOIL
November 8, 2010 13:46
3 minute read.
Finance Minister Yuval Steinitz

311_steinitz is feeling cross. (photo credit: Ariel Jerozolimski)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

Finance Minister Yuval Steinitz denied emphatically Monday that there had been any secret deal hammered out between the Treasury and the haredi parties to pass legislation to provide subsidies for yeshiva students.

Speaking before the Knesset’s Finance Committee, Steinitz was met by a hail of criticism from Kadima MKs, but later in the day got a leg up from Interior Minister Eli Yishai, who backtracked on earlier statements that such an agreement existed.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.


RELATED:
Knesset passes budget with Yeshiva stipends included
Opinion: Who Pays for Yeshiva Students?

Steinitz denied assertions Yishai had made in an Army Radio interview earlier in the day that there was an agreement with the haredi parties, but said that he would “support any arrangement that is in line with parameters set by the Supreme Court.”

Throughout Steinitz’s briefing to the committee, Kadima MKs continued to press him on the issue of the alleged deal.

“Who are we supposed to believe?” asked Kadima MK Yohanan Plesner. “Should we believe what you said now in the committee, denying the existence of an agreement between Shas and the Treasury on the bill, or should we believe what Yishai said this morning on the radio, when he confirmed the existence of the agreement? Are your statements in the committee binding, or is what is binding what was posted on [haredi news website] Hadrei Haredim?” Plesner contended that “there is practically no serious person in the country who believes that there is going to be a real debate in the committee established by Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu [to probe the stipend issue]. Now it is clear that everything was determined in advance. I demand that you immediately reveal all of the other political agreements that you made in order to enable the passage of this anti-social-welfare budget.”

Hours after Steinitz’s emphatic denial, Yishai backtracked, telling Channel 2 that “there really were talks with the Treasury, but I’m sorry to let the wind out of your sails: There was no agreement in the end, to my regret.”

Yishai explained that “I thought the clause would make it in, but ultimately it did not.



In hearings on the budget, negotiations are held until late at night. Clauses go in and go out, even after we reached an agreement with the Treasury – which ultimately decided to remove the clause. If I had known that, I would have opposed its removal.”

Meanwhile, on Monday afternoon, Kadima MK Yoel Hasson called on Yishai to support his bill, which would provide living stipends for students registered in institutions of higher learning.

“I wish to congratulate you for your statement that you support living stipends for students,” Hasson wrote to Yishai.

In light of such statements, he continued, “and in light of the need to ensure the rights and welfare of students, like those of yeshiva students, I request your support and that of Shas for my bill, which will be brought up for debate in the Knesset in the coming days.”

Hasson’s bill, which he submitted two weeks ago in the shadow of the debate over stipends for yeshiva students, would provide similar funding for students who are enrolled full-time at institutions of higher learning and who meet other criteria similar to those included in the haredi-sponsored bill. To be eligible, the student would have to have at least one child and not own a vehicle or property, and neither the student nor their spouse could have registered any income in that tax year.

According to Hasson’s proposal, the education minister would also be empowered to determine other social and economic criteria for the stipend.

Related Content

Jisr az-Zarq
April 3, 2014
Residents of Jisr az-Zarqa beckon Israel Trail hikers to enjoy their town

By SHARON UDASIN