War c'tee pressed on personal conclusions

MK Gal-On says Winograd Committee should not shy away from using the mandate given to it.

October 9, 2007 21:52
1 minute read.
War c'tee pressed on personal conclusions

Gal-On 224.88. (photo credit: Ariel Jerozolimski [file])


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


MK Zehava Gal-On on Tuesday wrote to the head of the Winograd Committee of Examination into the Second Lebanon War, demanding to know whether news reports that the committee would not publish personal recommendations in its final report were true. "According to the leaks, it appears that the report will be harsh and include sharp criticism of the prime minister and the political and military echelons, but will not recommend firing anyone," Gal-On wrote to committee chairman Eliahu Winograd. She reminded Winograd that the members of the Kahan Commission, who investigated the massacre of hundreds of Palestinians in the Sabra and Shatilla refugee camps near Beirut, had written that the commission would not be fulfilling its task if it did not see to it that those who failed to do their jobs properly were punished. The same held true in the case of the Winograd Committee, she continued. "Even if the final report is harsh," wrote Gal-On, "even if it includes sharp criticism as did the interim report which studied the decision-making process of the political echelon which led, among other things, to the final operation of the war in which 33 soldiers were killed. Even if the report includes harsh statements regarding those who were responsible, the fact is that without operational recommendations, the examination will still be important, but it will certainly be insufficient." Meanwhile, The Movement for Quality Government demanded that the committee's final report include personal recommendations and conclusions. In a letter to Winograd, the movement charged that if the reports were true, the committee's decision was unreasonable to an extreme degree, deviated from the mandate and power given to it and undermined public confidence. The committee, therefore, "should change its mind."

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Jisr az-Zarq
April 3, 2014
Residents of Jisr az-Zarqa beckon Israel Trail hikers to enjoy their town