Winograd Committee rejects petitions to High Court

November 4, 2007 12:20
1 minute read.


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user uxperience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew, Ivrit
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Repor
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

The Winograd Committee on Sunday responded to petitions made to the High Court of Justice against its decision not to give advance warning to individuals who stand to be harmed by the committee's findings, and not to make personal recommendations in its findings. The committee has rejected both demands. In response to a petition by the Military Defender demanding that the Winograd Committee warn in advance anyone who may be hurt by its findings, the committee has said that the Military Defender has crossed the lines of good taste. While the Military Defender provides important legal assistance to military officers and soldiers, the committee said, it was not aware that the defense's members possessed "supernatural powers" which enabled it to determine today what the future report would say. The committee sees the petition as nothing more than an attempt to hurt public trust in its work, the response said. In response to a petition filed by the Movement for Quality Government, the committee confirmed that that there would be no personal conclusions or recommendations in it final report, as has been widely speculated. The committee attacked the movement's attempt to interfere with its work and to determine how the committee should edit its report, adding that to the best of its members' knowledge, there were no legal grounds for the movement's demands.

Related Content

Jisr az-Zarq
April 3, 2014
Residents of Jisr az-Zarqa beckon Israel Trail hikers to enjoy their town