Winograd: PM was 'hasty' in decisions

Interim report to conlcude PM was led by army; Halutz neglected Katyusha threat.

April 27, 2007 23:26
1 minute read.
Winograd: PM was 'hasty' in decisions

halutz peretz 298 idf. (photo credit: IDF)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analysis from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


During last summer's Second Lebanon War Prime Minister Ehud Olmert acted in a "hasty" manner, according to the Winograd Committee interim report to be presented on Monday and which was reported by Channel 10 Friday night. Furthermore, according to the Channel 10 summary of the report, Olmert's decision-making was faulty, Defense Minister Amir Peretz lacked military knowledge and experience and then Chief of General Staff Lt.-Gen. Dan Halutz forced his decisions on the government. Despite the harsh nature of the long-awaited report, the Winograd Committee nevertheless reportedly refrains from calling on Olmert and Peretz to resign.

  • The lessons of 1948 In regard to Olmert's "hasty" and "faulty" decision-making process, the report also concludes that the prime minister was led by the army. Olmert, says the report, did not ask the IDF for alternatives and did not ask the questions expected of him. In addition, Olmert was unable to create a political horizon conducive to ending the conflict. Halutz was especially singled out by the Committee, which reportedly states that he did not treat Hizbullah's Katyusha [rocket] threat seriously. He not only forced his views on the government, but also silenced opposing views from within the general staff. According to Channel 10, Peretz's lack of military and security experience were highlighted in the report. With that, the defense minister did not attempt to force his lack of military knowledge on the decision-making process. Finally, the Committee reportedly concluded that the idea of a defense minister with a civilian background was not, at its core, wrong.

    Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

  • Related Content

    Jisr az-Zarq
    April 3, 2014
    Residents of Jisr az-Zarqa beckon Israel Trail hikers to enjoy their town