Winograd promises officers heads-up

IDF demands those named in report be allowed to review evidence against them.

By
July 18, 2007 19:25
2 minute read.
Winograd promises officers heads-up

eliyahu winograd 298.88. (photo credit: Ariel Jerozolimski)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user uxperience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew, Ivrit
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Repor
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

The IDF Prosecutor's Office received a letter on Wednesday from the head of the Winograd Committee, retired judge Eliyahu Winograd, informing it that the committee, established to investigate the failures of the Second Lebanon War, will send letters of caution to IDF officers who may be harmed by the report, the IDF announced. In response to the army's announcement, a spokesman for the Winograd Committee released the following statement: "As we explained in our interim report, the committee will make sure - before publication of the final report - to allow anyone who is liable to be hurt by the report to know what he may be hurt by and to defend himself before us if he has not already done so." It was not clear from the language of the statement whether those likely to be hurt would be allowed to bring lawyers and question witnesses as part of their defense. More on the comptroller's Home Front report:

  • Volunteers - Israel at its finest
  • Lindenstrauss praises doctors, MDA
  • Comptroller doesn't spare local authorities in report
  • Police receive unexpected leg up in report
  • Too little, too late from social services during war
  • IDF rejects report; claims cannot be blamed for all
  • PMO fires back at Lindenstrauss IDF Prosecutor Col. Orna David had sent a letter on June 28 to the Winograd Committee arguing the right of IDF officers who may be targeted in the report to be protected. David said officers named should receive notice before the report was published and have the right to review the evidence against them and question witnesses. On Wednesday, Winograd sent an answer to David, informing her of the committee's decision to send what he called "appropriate messages" to IDF officers who might come under the committee's scrutiny in its final report on the war. Winograd's letter also stated that the committee was continuing its investigation and reviewing evidence. The IDF said Winograd's answer was only partially satisfactory, since Winograd had refrained from informing David precisely in what way IDF officers would be able to review evidence against them or whether they would, in fact, be granted the right to question witnesses. IDF sources said that several high-ranking defense officials, including Deputy Chief of Staff Maj.-Gen. Moshe Kaplinsky, OC Northern Command Maj-Gen. Gadi Eizenkott (who was head of IDF operations during the war,) OC Ground Forces Maj.-Gen. Benny Gantz, as well as former chief of staff Lt.-Gen. (res.) Dan Halutz and former OC Northern Command Maj.-Gen. (res.) Udi Adam, might come under fire in the final report. It was understood from Winograd's letter that there would be a delay in the publication of the committee's final report, originally slated for October 2007. In its statement, the Winograd Committee added that it had never mentioned a date for the publication of the final report. The committee said it "cannot estimate when the report will be published because it has not yet completed the stage of examining and analyzing the material it currently has before it in such a way as to determine what material is still missing in order to present all the facts, reach conclusions, make recommendations and identify who stand to be hurt by the investigation and in what ways."

  • Related Content

    Jisr az-Zarq
    April 3, 2014
    Residents of Jisr az-Zarqa beckon Israel Trail hikers to enjoy their town

    By SHARON UDASIN