Euthanasia and Jewish law

December 7, 2005 03:17
1 minute read.


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analysis from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


Jewish law prohibits active euthanasia. However, there is a wide range of opinions as to what constitutes active, as opposed to passive, euthanasia. Professor Avraham Steinberg, author of the Encyclopedia Hilchatit Refu'it and Chairman of the committee that drafted the euthanasia bill, discusses the opinions in his book. All rabbis agree that even passive euthanasia is permissible only after it has been determined that the patient is terminally ill and further treatment is not only futile but also adds suffering. Jewish law does not take into consideration the age, mental lucidity, or socioeconomic status of the patient. Nor does Jewish law allow euthanasia in order to shorten suffering. Suffering, according to certain opinions in Jewish theology, is determined by God and therefore must be allowed to take its course. Steinberg presents three basic approaches to treatment of terminally ill patients in pain. The first, most stringent approach makes no distinctions between different types of patients. Every effort must be made to lengthen life. The second approach posits that if the patient asks for relief from suffering, it is permitted to refrain from administering treatment. The third approach, which Steinberg seems to accept, prohibits the active lengthening of life in cases of great pain. In the footnotes to his encyclopedia, Steinberg recounts the death of his own father. Rabbi Shlomo Zalman Orbach, considered one of the greatest halachic authorities of the modern era, directed him to discontinue nor-epinephrine, a drug that stabilizes blood pressure, after Steinberg's father's respiratory system and kidneys failed. However Steinberg adds that all the natural needs of the patient, such as food and oxygen, must be provided. Treatments, such as antibiotics, that prevent complications common to non-terminal patients must also be continued.

More about:Shlomo Goren

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Joan Rivers
August 28, 2014
Joan Rivers rushed to hospital following throat surgery


Cookie Settings