Chief rabbinate agrees to reconsider shmita stringencies

A panel of judges including Supreme Court President Dorit Beinisch gives rabbinate until next Monday to reconsider appointing more lenient kosher supervisors.

September 11, 2007 04:32
3 minute read.
dorit beinisch 88 298

dorit beinisch 88 298. (photo credit: Ariel Jerozolimski)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


Israel's highest court clashed with the Jewish state's rabbinic leadership Monday as Chief Ashkenazi Rabbi Yona Metzger acquiesced to a Supreme Court request to reconsider the rabbinate's stringent stand on Jewish laws pertaining to the shmita [sabbatical] year. A panel of three judges, which included Supreme Court President Dorit Beinisch, gave the rabbinate until next Monday to reconsider appointing more lenient kosher supervisors in cities and towns in which the local rabbi adopted a stringent stand on fruits and vegetables grown in Israel by Jewish farmers. The Supreme Court asked the Chief Rabbinate's Governing Council, which is headed by Metzger, to reconsider a ruling made two weeks ago that gave local rabbis the perogative to reject as non-kosher produce grown by Jewish farmers during the shmita year. According to Jewish law, agricultural activities are highly restricted in every seventh year. The produce that is grown by Jews who disregard these restrictions is not kosher. However, a solution exists within the framework of Jewish law that allows Jewish farmers to continue to work as usual, but it is controversial. Known as heter mechira, the solution involves selling Jewish-owned land in Israel to a non-Jew. The Chief Rabbinate officially adopted heter mechira as a legitimate legal solution to the restrictions of the shmita year, so as not to force Jewish farmers to either halt all agricultural activity or to market fruits and vegetables through non-kosher channels. Nevertheless, several local rabbis, who belong to the Chief Rabbinate and receive salaries from the state, have refused to recognize heter mechira. In Herzliya, Petah Tikva, Netanya, Jerusalem and Bat Yam, among other cities, local rabbis have announced that markets, restaurants and other food-serving venues would not receive kosher certificates if they sold produce grown under the auspices of heter mechira. The Growers Council and the Farmers Association petitioned the Supreme Court last week arguing that the Chief Rabbinate's acceptance of these rabbis' stringencies has made it difficult for them to sell their fruits and vegetables. Growers estimated that they were liable to sustain a loss of as much as NIS 700 million in the upcoming shmita year, if stringent local rabbis banned their produce. Shaul Peles, the attorney who represents the two organizations, said that the decision of the local rabbis not to allow the sale of heter mechira produce would strike a serious blow to the local agricultural industry. "The Supreme Court made it clear that it opposed the Chief Rabbinate's overly stringent stand," said Peles. "There is hope that the danger to local agriculture that would result if the rabbinate had its way will be avoided." However, Rabbi Ratzon Arussi, chief rabbi of Kiryat Ono and a member of the Chief Rabbinate's Governing Council, said that the Supreme Court had no business interfering in inherently religious issues involving Jewish law. "Whether or not to recognize heter mechira is a purely halachic issue that is not under the Supreme Court's jurisdiction," said Arussi, who has a degree in law from Hebrew University. Rabbis in the Chief Rabbinate are now debating their next course of action. Metzger's spokesman said that in the coming days, the Chief Rabbinate's Governing Council would be convened to discuss the issue of the local rabbis' autonomy. Some rabbis argue it would better for the Chief Rabbinate to backtrack before the Supreme Court forces it to. These rabbis told The Jerusalem Post that if the Supreme Court were to issue a decision forcing the Chief Rabbinate to capitulate, it would undermine the body's authority vis-a-vis the secular court. However, other rabbis argued that the Chief Rabbinate should stick by its decision. If the Supreme Court intervenes and forces the Chief Rabbinate to require its employees to allow heter mechira produce, "everyone will know that heter mechira is under the kosher supervision of the Supreme Court, not the Chief Rabbinate, and they will treat it that way," one said.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Joan Rivers
August 28, 2014
Joan Rivers rushed to hospital following throat surgery