Rabbis leave meeting with Carter upset

Tell former president "your new book has hurt our relationship with you and hurt our understanding of who you are and what you're trying to do."

December 18, 2006 10:34
3 minute read.
Rabbis leave meeting with Carter upset

protest 88. (photo credit: )


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analysis from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


With former president Jimmy Carter traveling the US touting his book Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid, which blames Israel for the absence of peace with the Palestinians, a group of Phoenix-area rabbis hoped a face-to-face meeting could patch things up and help repair Carter's relationship with the Jewish community. But Tuesday evening's meeting disappointed members of the executive committee of the Phoenix Board of Rabbis. "As a Jewish community, we have had a great deal of respect over the years for the human rights work you have done and your commitment to the peace process," Rabbi Andrew Straus said, describing the group's message to Carter. "But your new book has hurt our relationship with you and hurt our understanding of who you are and what you're trying to do." The meeting, which lasted more than an hour, was described as cordial and respectful, but the rabbis left disheartened. Carter claimed to be unaware of significant political differences within the American Jewish community with regard to Israel, and refused to speak out on behalf of the three IDF soldiers being held captive in the Gaza Strip and Lebanon. He also told the rabbis that his use of the incendiary term "apartheid" was meant to apply only to the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, and not to Israel itself, which he described as a vibrant democracy. The rabbis professed to be "shocked" by the revelation, noting that the book did not convey any sense of admiration for Israel. Carter promised he would be more explicit in drawing that distinction in subsequent media interviews. Carter also expressed a willingness to condemn Palestinian terrorism more vociferously and to consider traveling to Israel with the rabbis, provided they also agreed to visit locations he deemed significant for his understanding of the conflict. The meeting concluded with participants joining hands in prayer. In a subsequent phone call with Carter, Straus asked the former president if he saw the Palestinians as bearing any measure of culpability for the breakdown in the peace process. "He couldn't see any failures," Straus said. "Somehow or another, he has accepted the Palestinian vision and understanding of the Israeli-Arab dialogue, and is not able to be critical of the Palestinian community," said Straus, of Temple Emanuel of Tempe, Arizona. "You read through the book and there's almost no criticism of Palestinians, almost no mention of terrorism." Released last month, Carter's book has come under intense criticism from Jewish organizations who have blasted everything from its title - which evokes comparisons to apartheid South Africa - to its scholarship, which has been described as shoddy and riddled with errors. The Anti-Defamation League, in particular, has taken Carter to task, sponsoring an ad campaign in major American publications and devoting a section of its Web site to criticizing the book. Abraham Foxman, the ADL's national director, told JTA that Carter is "engaging in anti-Semitism" by suggesting that his book is a reaction to stifled debate on Israel. Criticism of Carter has not been restricted to Jewish organizations. Writing in The Washington Post, Michael Kinsley called the apartheid analogy "a foolish and unfair comparison, unworthy of the man who won - and deserved - the Nobel Peace Prize." The chorus of outrage was heightened by the resignation last week of Kenneth Stein from his post as a fellow of the Carter Center, the former president's human rights foundation based at Emory University in Atlanta. In his letter, which ended a 23-year association with the center, Stein said the book is "replete with factual errors, copied materials not cited, superficialities, glaring omissions, and simply invented segments." Carter has stood his ground, as he did in the Phoenix meeting. In interviews he has said that in some instances, Israeli conduct is "even worse" than was South Africa's. And in a recent Op-Ed in The Los Angeles Times, he said there are "severe restraints" imposed on any discussion of the issue. Noting the coincidence of the Iranian conference on the Holocaust and the Carter meeting, Rabbi Bonnie Koppel, who serves three congregations in the Phoenix area, told JTA she was saddened by the experience. "I can't say that I came away from the meeting feeling satisfied," Koppel said. "I just came away feeling that this is a very hard week to be a Jew." In a letter to "Jewish citizens of America," released Friday by the Carter Center, Carter denied he ever had claimed that American Jews control the media. Carter said that what he sees as "overwhelming bias for Israel" comes from the Christian community. He noted the "powerful influence of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, which is exercising its legitimate goal" of marshalling support for Israel in Washington, although he claimed that there are "no significant countervailing voices." Carter said Middle East peace should be based on recognition of Israel's right to exist within what he called its "legally recognized 1967 borders."

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Joan Rivers
August 28, 2014
Joan Rivers rushed to hospital following throat surgery