How does Islam require POWs to be treated?

What did the PRC mean when it said that Gilad Shalit was being treated according to "Islamic standards?"

January 9, 2007 19:52
1 minute read.
shalit, gilad, 298 ch 10

shalit, gilad, 298 ap. (photo credit: AP)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


What did the Palestinian Resistance Committee (PRC) mean when it stated that kidnapped soldier Cpl. Gilad Shalit, "is being treated according to Islamic standards of dealing with prisoners of war?" According to Sheikh Abdala Darvish, the spiritual head of the southern faction of the Islamic Movement in Israel and a respected Islamic authority, the Sha'aria (Islamic law) has detailed directives governing the treatment of prisoners of war. Shalit's captors were obligated, according to Sha'aria, to keep the soldier alive and healthy, said Darvish. "They must give him the food that he likes at the times he likes eating," said Darvish. Islamic law also prohibits degrading or scaring a prisoner of war. "The captors are even obligated to give their prisoner a feeling of friendship," added Darvish, who said it was legitimate to hold a prisoner of war until the hostilities were resolved. MK Ibrahim Sarsur (United Arab List-Ta'al), a leader of the Islamic Movement's more moderate southern faction, said that the basis for Islamic war ethics was the prophet Muhammad's war manual. Over the past 1,400 years, voluminous additions have been made to these religious military codes. "Regarding the treatment of prisoners of war, the basic principle is that as soon as an enemy soldier has been neutralized and taken out of the war, the Muslim army is responsible for taking care of him." However, sources familiar with the workings of the Hamas-affiliated PRC are skeptical about the extent to which these terrorist groups see themselves as obligated to normative Islamic law. Even Darvish admitted that what he called "Israeli subjugation" of Palestinians forced them to transgress Islamic law. Nevertheless, Darvish said, that in the case of Shalit, he had information that the soldier was being treated in accordance with Islamic directives.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

turkey turkish officer
October 18, 2018
Turkey's top oil refiner appeals to U.S for waiver from Iran sanctions