UN cohesion 'ups the ante' in Congress battle over Iran, Moniz says

US energy secretary warns of "significant problems" for US with int'l partners should Congress vote down Iran agreement in September.

By
July 26, 2015 21:24
1 minute read.
United States Capitol building in Washington, DC

United States Capitol building in Washington, DC.. (photo credit: REUTERS)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user uxperience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew, Ivrit
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Repor
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

WASHINGTON – US Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz, an architect of the nuclear deal reached with Iran this month, warned on Sunday of “significant problems” for the United States with its international partners should Congress disapprove of the agreement in a vote in September.

A vote of disapproval with support from the two-thirds of the legislature, Moniz said, would compromise the “cohesion” secured among the US, Britain, France, Russia, China and Germany in its negotiations over the deal.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.


World powers reached the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action on July 14. It is intended to cap, restrict, monitor and partially roll back Iran’s nuclear work for a finite period in exchange for sanctions relief.

The JCPOA was swiftly adopted by the UN Security Council last week. Congress now has 52 days to review the agreement, and then may choose to vote to approve or disapprove of it.

“This really was a six-nation negotiation – the five permanent members of the Security Council plus Germany. And sure, we had to negotiate among ourselves, because there are lots of trade-offs in this,” Moniz told CNN’s Fareed Zakaria, who opened his morning show by endorsing the deal and criticizing its opponents.

“For example,” Moniz continued, “even the one-year breakout time – there are many ways to achieve that and different countries weighted things differently. But I think in the end, in that case, our scientists from all six countries worked very, very well together.”

Moniz argued that the agreement among Security Council members, in and of itself, constituted “a major outcome of the negotiation. And that cohesion, of course, really ups the ante in the current congressional discussion if we were to undermine this agreement at this stage. We would have significant problems with other major powers.”



In casting the American vote in favor of affirming the JCPOA in the Security Council, US Ambassador to the UN Samantha Power said she hopes agreement could provide a model to solve some of the world’s greatest challenges outside the Iran nuclear file.

The Obama administration argues that the deal represents a victory for diplomacy over conflict, verifiably prevents Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon, and furthers the cause of world peace.

The governments of Israel, Saudi Arabia, and Jordan oppose the deal in its current form.

Related Content

July 19, 2018
Sources close to Netanyahu: Trump knew the Iran nuclear deal was bad

By HERB KEINON, MICHAEL WILNER