Egyptians and Tunisians alike hailed the decision of their new governments on Wednesday to file criminal charges against their former presidents, Husni Mubarak and Zine Al-Abidine Ben Ali. But the pursuit of justice may well make it tougher for the opposition elsewhere in the Middle East to push unwanted leaders out of office.
RELATED:'Mubarak may be hanged if he ordered rioters' deaths''US, West seeking country of refuge for Gaddafi'
Mubarak and his two sons, Gamal and Alaa, were detained on Wednesday for 15 days pending questioning on charges of corruption and the murder of protesters during the popular uprising that led to the president’s ouster two months ago. The same day Tunisian authorities presented 18 legal cases against Ben Ali, including "voluntary manslaughter" and "drug trafficking," the state news agency TAP reported.
Libyan strongman Muammar Gaddafi faces legal action even as he battles
rebels for control of the country after the International Criminal Court
(ICC) announced March 3 it had started a formal investigation into
possible crimes against humanity. Several of his sons and members of his
inner circle are being probed as well.
The indictments raise the question whether it is better to bring former
despots through the courts to trial or to forgive and forget. The first
increases the incentive for those still clinging to power to hold on, at
cost of prolonged conflicts. The second potentially saves lives, but
sets aside justice and the sense of closure for people who suffered
under the old regime.
"I am all for justice being done," Max Boot of the Council on Foreign
Relations wrote in a recent commentary, "but I think the prime
imperative in this case is to oust a brutal dictator; he will be held to
account in any case by his Maker." Boot suggested a system whereby the
United Nations Security Council grants immunity to dictators as part of a
deal to leave power.
In Libya, fighting between the strongman’s loyalists and opposition
forces has gone on since mid-February, with no end in sight. British
Prime Minister David Cameron, whose country’s troops are also at risk in
their role as part of the no-fly zone imposed over Libya, is among
those who have suggested immunity for Gaddafi.
Of the two leaders facing charges, Mubarak is in the more dangerous
position. After he was forced out of office February 11, he took up
residence at his vacation home in the Sinai resort of Sharm e-Sheikh,
keeping him within reach of Egyptian law. The Egyptian daily Al-Masri Al-Youm
reported on Thursday that the 83-year-old Mubarak, who was recovering
from a heart attack in a Sharm e-Sheikh hospital, was "emotionally
devastated" and not eating following the arrest warrant.
Tunisia faces serious obstacles to bringing Ben Ali to court. After 23
years in power, he fled to Saudi Arabia on January 14. Tunisian Justice
Minister Lazhar Karoui Chebbi, who announced the indictments, said
Tunisian Authorities were exploring the legal options of extraditing Ben
Ali from Saudi Arabia.
But Masoud Ramadani, a member of the Tunisian Human Rights Union, said
the idea of Ben Ali facing justice was adequate. "All Tunisians are very
happy today," he told The Media Line. "Most would prefer if Ben Ali
stood trial in Tunisia. But even if he is tried in absentia, that would
be good too."
Jane Kinninmont, a Middle East researcher at Chatham House, a
London-based think tank, acknowledged that rulers may hold on to power
at all costs for fear of being indicted. "The International Criminal
Court was criticized for pursuing the indictment of Muammar Gaddafi,"
But, she stressed, those pushing for Mubarak's indictment believe there
are pragmatic reasons to press charges against him. "It's not justice
versus pragmatism," Kinninmont told The Media Line. "Supporters of
Mubarak's indictment say that it sends a strong message to current
leaders that they will be held accountable if they act improperly."
For leaders looking for an exit that doesn’t segue into a prison cell,
the alternatives are asylum or the formation of a
truth-and-reconciliation commission, of the kind that was set up in
South Africa in the post-Apartheid years, that will conducts an
investigation without an indictment.
Among Middle East leaders fighting for their thrones, Yemeni President
Ali Abdullah Saleh has offered to step down before the end of 2011, but
opposition leaders in the country rejected the Saudi mediation efforts
and proposed a two-week deadline for his resignation starting April 13.
It was unclear what Saleh has been offered in return for stepping down, but the Lebanese daily Al-Akhbar
reported that Saudi Arabia had offered him asylum as well.
Gaddafi has reportedly been offered asylum by Uganda. But officials in the country denied the report.
Christopher Stephen, author of Judgment Day: The Trial of Slobodan Milosevic
, which recounts the trial of the former Serbian leader, said in an opinion piece in The Financial Times
this week that the world shouldn’t trade justice for peace but pursue the justice route.
“The crimes are fresh – in the case of Libya, they are still taking
place. Investigators have uncontaminated crime scenes, access to
witnesses and evidence” Stephen wrote. “Events in Libya have shown that
the West cannot be the world’s policeman. It cannot stop every abuse and
outrage. But it can, through the ICC, call those committing abuses to
account. In so doing, it can encourage other tyrants across the world to
think twice before committing abuses of their own.”
Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>