(photo credit: AP [File])
Hamas' turbulent first month in power has laid bare brewing friction between the group's Syria-based hard-line chief abroad Khaled Mashaal, and elected leaders in the West Bank and Gaza.
The dispute rages over one central issue - whether Hamas, whose charter calls for Israel's destruction, should moderate its ideology.
Party hierarchy places supreme power in the hands of Hamas chief Khaled Mashaal, who lives more than 100 miles (160 kilometers) away from the chaos of the West Bank and Gaza. However, with Hamas now running the Palestinian Authority, that balance of power could shift.
Hamas professes to have a united front. "There is no distinction between inside and outside (leaders)," said Hamas spokesman Sami Abu Zuhri, who lives in Gaza. "This is a conspiracy by some foreign media to try to show there are differences. The movement is united."
But there's no denying that Hamas leaders in the Palestinian territories are more pragmatic, if not more moderate, where Israel is concerned. They've maintained a 15-month-old truce with Israel, while sending mixed messages, refusing to renounce violence or negotiate, while speaking vaguely about the possibility of peace in interviews to the foreign media.
A senior Hamas official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said Monday the group was debating whether to adopt a 2002 Arab peace initiative - a move that would implicitly recognize Israel because the plan envisions the creation of a Palestinian state alongside Israel.
The official said Hamas would not decide quickly, so as not to be seen as succumbing to Western pressure. Israel has rejected the plan, which would involve giving up all of the West Bank and east Jerusalem.
Mashaal has made it clear since Hamas swept Palestinian elections that he has no intention of disarming the group or leading it into negotiations with Israel.
Hamas' hierarchy suggests that the government is bound to carry out Mashaal's policies, and upon joining Hamas, members vow an oath of allegiance to the group's supreme leader.
But others think Hamas "insiders" in the West Bank and Gaza Strip might gain the upper hand because they have cultivated close ties with the Palestinian people - something that Mashaal, who left his native West Bank 40 years ago, cannot claim.
If the Hamas Cabinet "succeeds in governing the Palestinian society and the occupied territories ... I think the weight will shift toward the inside," said Basem Ezbidi, a political science professor at Bir Zeit University in the West Bank. "But if Hamas loses ground and fails in doing so, I think the weight will continue being in the outside section."
Former Palestinian Planning Minister Ghassan Khatib, an independent, thinks the hierarchical discipline that made Mashaal the unassailable ruler might unravel. "This is the nature of political groups or organizations," Khatib said. "When they are underground or subject to harassment from the authorities or the occupation, they have to be unified, they have to be disciplined in order to survive. ... The fact that they are in power will spoil them."
Hamas' political arm amassed much of its power from the tens of millions of dollars it raised in the Muslim world in the two decades before the group swept Jan. 25 elections, but that money may be less influential now, because it is having a hard time reaching the Palestinian territories.
Two weeks ago, when he thought Abbas went too far by vetoing Hamas' plan to form a militants' army, Mashaal didn't hesitate to speak out.
"We can understand that Israel and America are persecuting us, and seeking ways to besiege and starve us, but what about the sons of our people who are plotting against us, who are following a studied plan to make us fail?" Mashaal said, without mentioning Abbas by name.
With Fatah protests breaking out in the West Bank and Gaza over Mashaal's remarks, the Hamas government's deputy prime minister, Nasser Shaer, promptly insisted Mashaal's statements did not reflect government opinion.