Tent city 311.
(photo credit: Ben Hartman)
It’s not clear what’s more astonishing here: young Israelis demonstrating
passionately for social justice, or the Netanyahu government announcing new
national legislation promoting affordable housing.
RELATED:Leef to PM: We weren’t born yesterdayFM on housing issue: 'Put things back into perspective'Comment: They just don’t get it
But what is clear is
that the tent camp is already influencing policy – and maybe, if it continues,
can succeed in creating real change.
The news from Tuesday’s press
conference is that the government is starting to veer from the well-worn free
The beginning of the speech was still on the beaten trail:
how increasing the supply of homes would reduce prices for all.
message became more interesting after that.
One initiative was to sell
public land at below-market value to developers who commit to building rental
housing, including from 25 to 40 percent submarket rate rentals.
proposed measure relates to inclusionary housing legislation, following a
well-established practice internationally in which municipalities require
developers to allocate a portion of new homes for affordable housing, usually
indistinguishable from the market-rate units. And a third component included an
ambitious program to meet the need for student housing in the periphery, by
building thousands of new dormitory rooms.
These initiatives do differ
significantly from past policies. The government is finally adopting measures to
promote rental housing at sub-market rates, a significant departure from the
national obsession with home ownership. And the government is finally proposing
steps that require significant budgetary commitments, over and above
As a responsible government, it must know it’s
just not possible to develop below-market rate rental housing without subsidies
for building and managing the homes. Surely it’s aware that inclusionary housing
legislation, everywhere in the world, always comes with a dedicated package of
funding streams or financial incentives. And it must be obvious that no private
developer is going to build student dormitories in the periphery, where the cost
of land is already negligible, without guarantees of an income stream, and
probably also direct grants.
So the tent dwellers are right to say “we’ll
follow the money” – the prime minister or housing and finance ministers never
mentioned the cost of the programs, or the budgetary sources. Neither did they
articulate important details of the proposals: who will be eligible for rental
housing, how much will it cost, how long can one remain there, who will manage
and maintain it, what are the roles and expectations from city government and,
critically, where will the new homes be built.
But, assuming the
government allocates sufficient budgets, and develops equitable criteria, do
these proposals meet the expectations of the tent dwellers? Not yet.
the proposals were aimed at “young people,” “students,” and “young couples.” But
the voices from tent camps have made it clear that the advocates aren’t
struggling just for themselves.
They are the voice of a much larger
segment of the unrepresented population who are also unable to afford the cost
of housing: elderly people whose pensions have been cut and who can’t afford to
retrofit their homes for wheelchairs, very poor families who can only find work
if they live where they can’t afford the rent, people who purchased their public
housing homes and now find themselves unable to maintain the building and those
Arab citizens of Israel who don’t own land, and in whose towns there simply is
no rental market or homes for sale.
A very different set of solutions is
needed for these large groups.
The starting measures include new public
housing, rental allowances pegged to household income and to the real costs of
rent, and not arbitrarily determined by the Treasury, support for nonprofit
social purchasing groups, and loans and grants for home repairs. More
creatively, the government could look into funding nonprofit agencies to help
owners reinforce their buildings against earthquakes, using national planning
benefits, such as TAMA 38, to build new affordable rental housing on the
The government could announce plans to help stabilize
the existing rental market by allowing cities to offer owners the chance to have
their property professionally managed, in return for agreeing to stable rent
increases. And they could, and should, devote significant resources to making
all our cities, not just Tel Aviv, into vibrant places where creative young
people can ride a bike to work, walk their children to school, live next to
people very different from themselves and be surprised, once in a while, by
what’s around the corner.
The measures announced are an important first
step. The tent camp inhabitants, and all their many supporters, can take hope,
and remain steadfast in pursuit of inclusive and comprehensive social justice.
Perhaps this generation of Israelis will come to believe in their own ability to
make a difference. If so – they just might make a better future for all of
us.Dr. Emily Silverman lectures on housing policy and social planning at
the Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, and is a Senior Research Fellow at
the Samuel Neaman Institute for National Policy Research.