City demands closure of Mugrabi Bridge in one week

J'lem municipality insists decrepit state of bridge could lead to a “Carmel Fire II.”

December 9, 2011 03:57
4 minute read.
Mughrabi Gate bridge

Mughrabi Gate bridge 311. (photo credit: Marc Israel Sellem)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analysis from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


The Jerusalem Municipality threatened on Thursday to close the bridge that links the Western Wall plaza to the Temple Mount next week due to safety concerns, a move that could incite violence across the Arab world.

The city insisted the decrepit state of the Mugrabi Bridge could lead to a “Carmel Fire II,” referring to the forest fire on Mount Carmel last year that claimed 44 lives.

'PM delays demolition of Mughrabi Bridge'
Mughrabi Bridge renovation gets municipal nod

The wobbly wooden bridge is the only entrance for non- Muslims to the Temple Mount. The temporary structure was built in 2004 after a snowstorm caused the original earthen ramp to collapse.

But the explosive nature of the area, holy to Jew, Muslims and Christians, has made what would normally be a routine bridge replacement a thorny and dangerous issue.

“The dilapidated state of the bridge and the danger of it catching fire could demand a high price in human life; the bridge could collapse on the Western Wall plaza and injure worshipers in the women’s area, and a fire on the bridge could cause very heavy damage to the Western Wall and even extending to the Temple Mount,” a municipal spokeswoman said.

In October, the municipality gave the Western Wall Heritage Fund one month to begin replacing the bridge. Its management threatened to destroy the old structure on November 28. At the last minute, Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu intervened to stop the demolition, citing the unrest sweeping Egypt ahead of elections there, and the concern that much anger would be directed at Israel if the renovations went ahead.

Construction in 2007 of a replacement bridge sparked violent protest marches in Jordan, as well as calls for a third intifada, and riots in the holy basin, the area immediately surrounding the Old City.

The Council for Muslim Interests in Israel has demanded that any construction be done in cooperation with the Wakf Islamic trust or other Muslim organizations. Authorities in the Wakf, the Jordanian entity that controls Muslim holy sites in Jerusalem, including the Aksa Mosque on the Temple Mount, told the media that the reaction in the Arab world to replacement of the bridge would be violent.

“It will confuse the status quo and all the quiet that we have now in Jerusalem,” said Kais Nasser, an attorney with the Council for Muslim Interests.

“It could end in violence and demonstrations.”

The issue of a replacement bridge and coordination with Muslim authorities was set to be discussed by the High Court of Justice in June, but the case was pushed off until December 28. Another case involving the Western Wall plaza and the Mugrabi Bridge will be heard by the Jerusalem District Court in January.

Nasser said that the Council was pressing for no change to the current bridge, or, if a bridge must be built, a return to the earthen ramp that was destroyed in 2004. He dismissed the city’s dire warnings.

“We don’t believe this claim, our advisers said there is no urgent need to destroy the bridge... and the present danger is not serious,” he said.

In a letter to the Western Wall Heritage Foundation on Thursday, City Engineer Shlomo Eshkol wrote: “By virtue of my authority according to section 6a of the Law of Assistance and according to the opinion and after checks made upon the structure, I hereby determine that there exists immediate danger to the users, to the public, and to the property nearby, due to the flammability and potential for collapse. Therefore I intend to issue an order to close the structure and not allow any use of it.”

The municipality gave the Western Wall Heritage Foundation a week to appeal the Eshkol’s order. Thursday’s order threatened to close the bridge to pedestrians, rather than to demolish it, as previous letters from the engineer have demanded. The bridge will only be used by security personnel in case of emergencies.

It is unclear how tourists and non-Muslims will enter the Temple Mount if not through the Mugrabi Gate. Muslims use a variety of side gates to the plaza, but those are traditionally not open to non-Muslims.

A spokesman at the Western Wall Heritage Foundation said it had received the letter and was studying the order and its consequences. “Of course, every decision will take into account the safety needs of the bridge users and the Western Wall worshipers,” the spokesman said.

The decision of whether to demolish the bridge and build a replacement rests with the Prime Minister’s Office. Officials at the PMO declined to comment on the issue.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

August 31, 2014
Rioting resumes throughout east Jerusalem Saturday night


Cookie Settings