Person of the year in legal affairs: David Heshin

'Jerusalem Post' legal correspondent, Yonah Jeremy Bob, chooses Jerusalem District Court Acting President Heshin for dealing with Beit Shemesh corruption.

December 31, 2013 12:20
1 minute read.
David Heshin

David Heshin. (photo credit: Courtesy)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For a symbolic $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user uxperience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew, Ivrit
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Repor
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


What could justify David Heshin, President of the Jerusalem District Court, being the most influential legal person of the year, beating out justices on the Supreme Court for example? Heshin led the three judge panel that on Thursday ordered new elections in Beit Shemesh and nullified the October election results based on allegations of massive fraud.

Not only was the historic ruling completely unprecedented in its impact – in that most prior election fraud challenges were limited to individual voting stations – but his choice to take the initiative and his legal reasoning were genuinely daring.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.

The opinion itself admits that the issue has little precedent and many judges would have written an opinion sympathetic to those complaining of fraud, but refused to intervene, saying that only the Supreme Court could create such a new precedent.

Heshin did not wait. Not only that, rather than limiting his reasoning to saying that he was ordering new elections because he believed mathematically that enough votes might have been fraudulent to change the result, he also justified his ruling on the broader and bolder basis that democratic legitimacy must be maintained as a value.

This ruling may deter future mass fraud campaigns, and should they recur, will give future courts a wider basis to order new elections even if it is hard to gather the full mathematical substance and evidence of the fraud.

A nephew of former Deputy Supreme Court president Mishael Heshin, David has had other noteworthy rulings and even served for most of 2006 as an acting Supreme Court Justice.

Read more person of the year articles:

Related Content

August 31, 2014
Rioting resumes throughout east Jerusalem Saturday night