Think Again: The greatest threat

By losing their link to the future, Western societies find themselves hurtling towards extinction.

By
February 23, 2006 12:52
Think Again: The greatest threat

jonathanrosenblum88. (photo credit: )

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user uxperience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew, Ivrit
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Repor
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

One of radical Islam's signal successes has been to give credence to those who believe that religion constitutes the greatest threat to mankind. In the short run, a nuclear Iran presents the strongest candidacy for triggering an apocalypse. A strong case can be made, however, that too little religion constitutes as great a threat, in the long run. An economically stagnant, increasingly depopulated Europe is Exhibit A. The United States, which is both the developed world's most dynamic and most religious country, is Exhibit B. The Talmud in Ta'anit (23a) describes an incident involving Honi Hame'agel. One day, Honi saw an old man planting a carob tree, and asked him how long it would be before the tree bore fruit. The man answered, "Seventy years." Why, then, Honi inquired, was the man bothering to plant a tree whose fruits he would never eat. The man replied, "Just as my fathers planted for me, so am I planting for my children." Only as long as people conceive themselves as part of a chain of generations will they plant carob trees. That sense of generational continuity - the Burkean social contract between "those who are living, those who are dead, and those who are to be born" - no longer exists in Europe. Europe is rapidly becoming a childless society, whose citizens have neither the incentive nor the inclination to plan, much less sacrifice, for the future. With current birthrates, there will be a hundred million fewer Europeans by mid-century. Spain's birthrate is 1.1 children per couple, and a number of European nations and Canada are not far ahead. In the 1970s, the great fear was that an exploding world population would result in the rapid depletion of the earth's natural resources. Stanford professor Paul Ehrlich predicted in his best-selling The Population Bomb (1968) that hundreds of millions of people would starve to death in the 1970s. Four years later, the Club of Rome announced that the world would run out of a long list of crucial minerals - gold, mercury, tin, zinc, petroleum and gas - by 1993. None of those dire predictions came remotely close to fulfillment. But one natural resource is rapidly disappearing in many parts of the globe: human beings. And human beings, as Mark Steyn notes dryly in a recent New Criterion article, "It's the Demographics, Stupid," are the "one indispensable natural resource." Europe by the end of the century will resemble a continent hit by a slew of neutron bombs. The great buildings will still stand, but the people who built them will be gone. We are living, observes Steyn, through a period of "self-extinction of the races that built the modern world." This population decline is of immense consequence for Western nations. Societies with few children are by definition aging societies. A dwindling cohort of younger workers cannot foot the bill for the vast panoply of social benefits to which oldsters have become accustomed. As Steyn puts it, if only one million babies are born in 2006, it's a pretty good bet that a country will not be able to fill two million job openings in 2026. THE ONLY way to make up the shortfall is by importing a million foreign workers, most of them from Muslim countries. But that process will only expedite the transformation of Western Europe into an extension of the Maghreb, already predicted by Bernard Lewis. Not surprisingly, those who no longer take the biblical injunction to be fruitful and multiply seriously do less multiplying. The United States is both the Western world's most religious country and that with the highest birthrate. The "red states" carried by George W. Bush in 2004 included 25 out of the 26 states with the highest birthrates; John Kerry's "blue states" included the 16 with the lowest. A lack of children, however, is only one aspect of the West's lack of future orientation. Those who lack belief in an afterlife, indeed in any transcendent values that might give meaning to their lives, gravitate toward a hedonistic, here-and-now existence. Asked by Foreign Policy magazine what current ideas, values and institutions may disappear in the next 35 years, Princeton "ethicist" Peter Singer confidently predicted, "The traditional view of the sanctity of human life will collapse under pressure from scientific, technological and demographic developments." The proliferation of assisted suicide and euthanasia laws in Europe, and even in some American states, suggests that Singer's dystopian prediction may well come to pass. Singer himself denies any higher value to human life over that of animals. Human beings, he avers, are nothing more than the sum total of their pleasures, i.e., more sophisticated pleasure-seeking animals. Animals, however, do not generally plan for the future. Nor will citizens who have no one to whom to transfer their accumulated wealth, and who have long since ceased viewing their own countries as the embodiment of enduring values worthy of preservation be inclined to worry much about tomorrow. European workers have proven notoriously unwilling to consider any alteration in their increasingly unsupportable employment benefits. The attitude is: If the coffers run dry, that'll be someone else's problem. Why should I worry? EVEN THE most fundamental task of self-defense is beyond most of the West. For the past half century, European countries have been content to rely on the US for protection, while spending almost nothing on their own defense. Appeasement has become their default response to external and internal threats. Always better to push off danger to the indefinite future, which has ceased to be of concern. Confrontation, on the other hand, risks war, and with war goes death. If one's life has no meaning outside of itself, and death represents the end of everything, then one would be insane to opt for a course that increases the immediate risk to life, even if it results in greatly reduced future danger. Europe's inability to confront the threat of a nuclear Iran is but the latest example of the habit of appeasement. "Civilizations die from suicide, not by murder," observed historian Arnold Toynbee. By losing their connection to the future, the post-Christian societies of the West find themselves hurtling towards extinction. Click here for more articles by Jonathan Rosenblum

Related Content

 President Donald Trump, near an Israeli flag at the Israel Museum in Jerusalem
July 19, 2018
Lakeside diplomacy

By DAVID BRINN