Learn from mistakes

The problem is not so much the principle of supporting "moderates," but how this idea has been applied.

By
June 17, 2007 21:42
3 minute read.
Learn from mistakes

Abbas museum 298.88. (photo credit: AP)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later

Support moderates, oppose extremists: this has been Western mantra in the war against terrorism, including the branch known as the Arab-Israeli conflict. It is an obvious strategy, and it has ostensibly become simpler now that the two have become clearly divided, with Hamas in charge of Gaza and Fatah ruling in the West Bank. It is a strategy, however, that events have shown to be badly in need of adjustment. After all, thousands of weapons provided to "moderate" Fatah have now been captured by Hamas. Fatah's forces, on paper much stronger, better-equipped and certainly enjoying greater international backing, collapsed like a paper bag in Gaza, indicating that perhaps Western strategy had been flawed. Evidently, there was something wrong with the "moderates" who the US, Europe and Israel tried to back, or at least in how we tried to back them. The Jerusalem Post's Khaled Abu Toameh offers an explanation: "US-backed efforts to undermine the Hamas-led government over the past 16 months have failed, largely because most Palestinians clearly do not regard Fatah as a better alternative to Hamas." Following its 2006 election defeat, "Fatah failed to draw conclusions and get rid of all the icons of corruption among its top brass... Even if free and fair elections were held tomorrow... it is highly unlikely that Palestinians would vote for the same people they voted out in 2006." Most damning, Abu Toameh notes, is that the same scenario is already repeating itself on the West Bank: "The Israeli and Fatah campaign against Hamas is likely to backfire. The majority of the Palestinians in the West Bank have yet to come out in public to pledge their allegiance to Fatah in its war against Hamas. It's true that many West Bankers are unhappy with what Hamas has done in the Gaza Strip. But there are still many Palestinians who are fed up with the scores of Fatah armed gangs that have long been running wild in the West Bank." As Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and US President George W. Bush prepare to meet on Tuesday, the question is: How can we learn from past mistakes and begin to turn around a bad situation that seems to be headed for even worse? The problem lies not so much in the principle of supporting "moderates" over extremists, but in how this idea has been applied. The West has a long habit of defining these concepts in relative terms, rather than setting standards and sticking to them. If anyone doubted the folly of this, we now see what happens when the West latches on to the party deemed a lesser evil, regardless of whether - both in principle and in practical terms - that party warrants support. Israeli officials are already gearing up for "the opportunity to work with a leader [Mahmoud Abbas] we can really work with, both on security ... and financial issues." The US has also indicated that the aid embargo will be lifted for the new government Abbas has declared on the West Bank. None of this will work, however, if the Fatah leadership remains, in the eyes of most Palestinians, a gang of corrupt thugs. Though implementation has obviously been uneven, this is precisely what the Bush administration committed itself not to do after 9/11 - supporting "pro-Western" rulers regardless of their intrinsic democratic credentials and, in the name of "stability," producing the opposite of the desired result. The current turn of events is a rare opportunity to do better. Fatah now claims it collapsed before the Hamas forces because it had been busy fighting Israel. Before pouring in assistance, the US and Israel must demand that Fatah end its absurd competition with Hamas over which faction is more anti-Israel and instead provide a real alternative to the Islamist movement. This means giving Palestinians a true choice between building Palestine - including settling refugees, ending incitement and instituting the rule of law - and a fruitless war with Israel. Perhaps Palestinians, given a choice between Hamas's perpetual war and leaders who demonstrate they are serious about ending the war with Israel in order to create a Palestinian state, will still choose the former. Yet there is a chance that, given the opportunity, they are ready for peace. However slim that chance may be, we do know this: If the West continues to offer Palestinians nothing more than a choice between Hamas and a corrupt Hamas-lite, they are likely to continue to choose Hamas.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Britain’s Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn joins an anti-Trump protest in central London on July 13, 2018
October 20, 2018
Battling Corbyn, Israel’s main British enemy

By MANFRED GERSTENFELD