March 9: Telling 'Time'

Elliot Jager's "Breaking Begin" was a vivid reminder of an experience I had in the US in July 1979.

March 8, 2007 19:48
2 minute read.
March 9: Telling 'Time'

letters 88. (photo credit: )


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analysis from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


Telling 'Time' Sir, - Elliot Jager's important "Breaking Begin" (March 7) was a vivid reminder of an experience I had in the US in July 1979. I was prime minister Menachem Begin's adviser on external information, and he had sent me to the US to explain his government's settlement program to Jewish and general audiences. The embassy in Washington and consulates in different parts of the US organized the tour, meetings and media interviews. In New York I had a meeting with the editorial board of Time magazine, whose editor-in-chief was Henry Grunwald. A short while earlier full-page advertisements denouncing Begin's settlement policy had appeared in The New York Times and other papers, over the signatures of about 40 prominent Jewish personalities. These included Nobel Prize-winning author Saul Bellow, composer-conductor Leonard Bernstein, violinist Isaac Stern and, of course, Leonard Fine, a well-known leftist. Grunwald welcomed me to the meeting and asked whether the prime minister was not concerned that the leaders of the American Jewish community were against his policy. I asked to which leaders of the American Jewish community he referred. He pointed to the New York Times ad and mentioned some of the signatories. I responded by saying that while we highly admired Leonard Bernstein, for example, as a great musician, he was no leader of the American Jewish community. Who elected him? On what platform? What policy did he represent? The same applied to the others. "While we take account of the opposition of our friends in the Jewish community," I said, "the guiding principles that have to influence the government of Israel are the interests of the people of Israel, their security and safety." The discussion continued, Grunwald rather more subdued. I then told the group that my barber in Jerusalem had a sign on his wall saying that he had an agreement with the bank: "I don't change checks, and they don't cut hair!" "The same could apply to this discussion," I said. "We don't play the piano or the violin or conduct orchestras, and these great virtuosos cannot lead the nation of Israel as the prime minister and government do, who were elected by the majority of the people of Israel." The talk switched to other topics, and we ended as good friends. Time reported our discussion, quoting some of the above remarks. HARRY HURWITZ Menachem Begin Heritage Center Jerusalem Be serious Sir, - In "Knesset votes against Katsav impeachment" (March 8) MK Ruhama Avraham refers to "a law set down in the books, that an MK must be present at half of the discussions in order to vote on the issue" in committee. "It is often not practiced, but on an important issue such as this I felt it was appropriate." Because the issue was so important Avraham felt it appropriate to obey the law? Whereas "often," Knesset committees violate the law by counting the votes of MKs who were not present for discussions of the issue? Is this the same Knesset that acted scandalized when an MK was caught pressing the vote button of an absent colleague? MKs should take their own rules seriously, or change them. MARK L. LEVINSON Herzliya

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Investment [Illustrative]
July 18, 2019
Your Investments: Have your cake and eat it too


Cookie Settings