'Munich,' the travesty

By CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER
January 16, 2006 02:24

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

If Steven Spielberg had made a fictional movie about the psychological disintegration of a revenge assassin, that would have been fine. Instead, he decided to call this fiction Munich and root it in a real historical event: the 1972 massacre by Palestinian terrorists of 11 Israeli athletes at the Munich Olympics. Once you've done that - evoked the actual killing of innocents who, but for Palestinian murderers, would today be not much older than Spielberg himself - you have an obligation to get the story right. The only true part of the story is the few minutes spent on the actual massacre. The rest is invention, as Spielberg delicately puts it in the opening credits, "inspired by real events." By real events? Rubbish. Inspired by Tony Kushner's belief (he co-wrote the screenplay) that the founding of Israel was a "historical, moral, political calamity'' for the Jewish people. It is an axiom of filmmaking that you can only care about a character you know. In Munich, the Israeli athletes are not only theatrical but historical extras, stick figures. Spielberg dutifully gives us their names - Spielberg's List - and nothing more: no history, no context, no relationships, nothing. They are there to die. The Palestinians who plan the massacre and are hunted down by Israel are given - with the concision of the gifted cinematic craftsman - texture, humanity, depth, history. The first Palestinian we meet is the erudite poet giving a public reading, then acting kindly toward his Italian shopkeeper - before he is brutally shot in cold blood by the Jews. Then there is the elderly PLO man who dotes on his seven-year-old daughter before being blown to bits. Not one of these plotters is ever shown plotting Munich, or any other atrocity, for that matter. They are shown in the full flower of their humanity, savagely extinguished by the Jews. But the most shocking Israeli brutality involves the Dutch prostitute - apolitical, beautiful, pathetic - shot to death, naked, of course, by the now half-crazed Israelis settling private business. The Israeli way, I suppose. EVEN MORE egregious than the manipulation by character is the propaganda by dialogue. The Palestinian case is made forthrightly: The Jews stole our land, and we're going to kill any Israeli we can to get it back. Those who are supposedly making the Israeli case say... the same thing. The hero's mother, the pitiless committed Zionist, says: We needed the refuge. We seized it. Whatever it takes to secure it. Then she ticks off members of their family lost in the Holocaust. Spielberg makes the Holocaust the engine of Zionism, and its justification. Which, of course, is the Palestinian narrative. Indeed, it is the classic narrative for anti-Zionists, most recently the president of Iran, who says that Israel should be wiped off the map. And why not? If Israel is nothing more than Europe's guilt trip for the Holocaust, why should Muslims have to suffer a Jewish state in their midst? It takes a Hollywood ignoramus to give flesh to the argument of a radical anti-Semitic Iranian. Jewish history did not begin with Kristallnacht. The first Zionist Congress occurred in 1897. The Jews fought for and received recognition of the right to establish a "Jewish national home in Palestine'' from Britain in 1917, and from the League of Nations in 1922, two decades before the Holocaust. But the Jews' claim is far more ancient. Israel was their ancestral home, site of the first two Jewish Commonwealths for 1,000 years - long before Arabs, long before Islam, long before the Holocaust. The Roman destructions of 70 CE and 135 CE extinguished Jewish independence, but never the Jews' claim and vow to return to their home. The miraculous Jewish return 2,000 years later was tragic because others had settled in the land and had a legitimate competing claim. Which is why the Jews have, for three generations, offered to partition the house. The Arab response in every generation has been rejection, war and terror. And Munich. Munich, the massacre, had only modest success in launching the Palestinian cause with the blood of 11 Jews. Munich, the movie, has now made that success complete 33 years later. Munich now enjoys high cinematic production values and the imprimatur of Steven Spielberg, no less, carrying the original terrorists' intended message to every theater in the world. This is hardly surprising considering that Munich's case for the moral bankruptcy of the Israeli cause - not just the campaign to assassinate Munich's planners but the entire enterprise of Israel itself - is so thorough that the movie concludes with the lead Mossad assassin, seared by his experience, abandoning Israel forever. Where does the hero resettle? In the only true home for the Jew of conscience sensitivity and authenticity: Brooklyn. The writer is a columnist for The Washington Post. Munich opens in Israel next week.

Related Content

August 15, 2018
Limits to Basic Law

By YANIV ROZNAI