Mainline or out of bounds

The National Council of Churches is too cozy with Ahmadinejad.

By ELWOOD MCQUAID
October 22, 2007 21:27
3 minute read.
Mainline or out of bounds

NCC 88. (photo credit: )

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later

Leaders of the National Council of Churches USA are fond of reminding us of its size and influence. In fact, a Web site reviewing the organization's newest yearbook called the NCC "the ecumenical voice of America's Orthodox, Protestant, Anglican, historic African American and traditional peace churches," boasting "35 communions with 45 million faithful members in 100,000 congregations in all 50 states." Impressive indeed. However, in reality, the NCC and its alter ego, the World Council of Churches, is a polyglot of religious organizations that defy the traditions and norms of the Christian faith. In their zeal to identify with radical influences, they often run afoul of conservative, evangelical Christians whose views they tag as the scourge of liberal progress and whose methods and ideology they equate with the likes of the Taliban and al-Qaida. For all of its self-presumption, the NCC can hardly be justified in its claim to be the religious voice of American Christianity. In fact, for many decades it has been viewed as out of bounds and inconsequential to society's survival and to the rational conduct of national and international affairs. A case currently before us makes the point. When Iranian despot Mahmoud Ahmadinejad came to our shores in September 2007, his visit caused a firestorm of protest from the halls of Congress to the streets of America. Our guest was the same man who almost daily flaunts his intention to wipe Israel off the face of the earth and then bring down the West. He denies the Holocaust, asks our president to convert to Islam, calls Zionists the most detested people in all of humanity, subverts governments, arms and trains jihadists, and declares his intent to possess nuclear weapons. Despite his track record and rap sheet, an "interfaith delegation" made up of more than 100 liberal religious representatives, including Catholics, United Methodists, Presbyterians, Episcopalians, and Unitarians, sat down with Ahmadinejad for an hour-long chat. The purpose of the powwow reportedly was to stress the need for diplomacy to prevent war. After hearing the man of the hour attempt to tell them what they wanted to hear, one delegate left the meeting "hopeful because of the statements Ahmadinejad made about the 'renunciation of war in the quest for peace.'" The New York meeting was a follow-up to two other meetings by interfaith ecumenical groups. The first was in New York in September 2006; the second, in Teheran in February 2007. The Teheran meeting demonstrated painfully who is influencing whom. The "Christian leaders" came away oozing kind words for the man who represents the antithesis of peace and tranquility. The NCC's associate general secretary for interfaith relations, Rev. Dr. Shanta Premawardhana, was impressed. He praised Ahmadinejad as a pious and witty man. "Ahmadinejad," he said, "comes across as a very religious man." J. Daryl Byler, director of the Mennonite Central Committee Washington Office, referred to Iran's president as speaking in measured tones, seeming reasonable, and having a witty personality. So taken was Byler with Ahmadinejad that even before the February trip, he wrote to President George W. Bush saying he wished the president would meet with his Iranian counterpart, whom he described as "bright and engaging." And, he wrote, "Like you, Ahmadinejad is a religious man. I believe you would enjoy one another's company. Your conversation could signal a positive change in a relationship severed more than 25 years ago." It is remarkable that Byler implied an equivalency between conservative Christianity and radical, Iranian-style Islam. Four days after meeting with the NCC delegation, where he exuded goodwill to all and a hunger for peace, Ahmadinejad reportedly told an audience in the Sudan, "Zionists are the true manifestation of Satan." Malcolm I. Hoenlein, executive vice chairman of the Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations, said it best when speaking of the religious leaders' mission to Teheran: "They're not going to convince him. Their very presence there gives him respectability." How true. The writer, a pastor, is a leader of the Christian Zionist movement in the US.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

September 25, 2018
Media Hypocrisy: Innocent until proven guilty

By MIKE EVANS