A US soldier guards a convoy with anti-ISIS envoy Brett McGurk in it last year..
(photo credit: REUTERS)
US President Donald Trump’s announcement that US troops would be withdrawn from northern Syria (also known as Rojava) in the coming months reminded Kurds of their proverbial lament that they have “no friends but the mountains.”
Nevertheless, the announcement shocked the international community, because it would not only provide an opportunity for Islamic State (Daesh) to return, but also the Turkish state alongside the Free Syrian Army (FSA), which mainly consists of radical Sunni Islamist rebels with links to Daesh, would massacre the Kurds who had bravely fought against Daesh and created their own unique radical democratic secular system in the heart of the chaos of Middle Eastern politics, led by the Democratic Union Party (PYD) and its military, the People’s Protection Units (YPG), which Turkey sees as a Kurdish terrorist organization and threat to its national security.
Russia, Iran and Turkey were not expecting such a move from the US, and all have welcomed it, particularly Turkey, whose military, armed with heavy machine guns, is waiting for the right moment to occupy Rojava, having already taken the Kurdish town of Afrin. Reuters reported that Hulusi Akar, the Turkish defense minister, declared that Kurdish militants in Syria “will be buried in their ditches when the time comes.”
Despite these threats, the Kurds have responded calmly to the withdrawal announcement. For instance, PYD Diplomatic Relations co-chair Salih Muslim commented on ANF News that although a US withdrawal would be a matter of concern with regard to the stabilization of Rojava, “We didn’t call them, and we’re not sending them away,” adding, “We rely on our own strength and defense... Our interests coincided, we acted together, but we never relied on them.” Of course, the Kurds are conscious of previous Western/US attitudes toward them; the most striking incident perhaps being in 1999, when Abdullah Ocalan, leader of the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK), was handed over to the Turks with the help of US secret intelligence services in Nairobi. Syrian Kurds follow Ocalan’s ideology, and their political success was built on his political theory.
Nonetheless, Kurdish and US regional interests currently overlap. While the Kurds need long-term protection, the US needs Rojava and the Kurds for two main reasons: stopping an Iranian Shia expansion in the region and securing Israel’s position in the Middle East.
Iran is struggling to preserve its political clout in the region, and to strengthen its geopolitical position is fighting to create a Shia crescent from Iran all the way down through Syria to the Mediterranean coast. Such an expansion of Shia Iran will be the greatest threat to US interests in the region in coming years.
Additionally, the growth of pro-Iran sentiment in Shia-majority Iraq, with which it shares deep socio-economic and cultural ties, impacts on US geopolitical interests. In this regard, Rojava plays a crucial role. Sherkoh Abbas, president of the Kurdistan National Assembly of Syria, noted that “the only deterrence to Iran is the Kurds [in Rojava]. The only way to disrupt the Shia crescent is [through] the Kurds.”
The potential expansion of Iranian influence in the region, the ambiguity of Turkish politics (which is leaning toward becoming a Sunni-based nationalist one-party state under the leadership of Recep Tayyip Erdogan), and the role of autocratic militarist Russia, which now has ties to both Iran and Turkey – all these factors lead to US concerns about how the national security of its favorite ally, Israel, can be guaranteed.
Although the US continues to proclaim that it will cooperate with Israel over Syria and in opposing Iran in the region, Israel is well aware that US withdrawal from Rojava would leave a power vacuum that would be filled by Iran and Turkey. Since both countries oppose Israeli political interests in the Middle East, their focus will move on to harming Israel. As Abbas indicated, relinquishing the Kurdish buffer zone constitutes a substantial threat to Israel, North Africa, Europe and the US.
For the US to withdraw from northern Syria would contradict any rational understanding of the geostrategic paradigm. In particular, the war against Daesh in the region, which has relied on coordination with the exceptionally effective and successful Kurdish fighters on the ground, gave the US the legitimacy to effectively control an historically important geostrategic area, thereby enabling it to monitor the expansion of Iran and strengthen its position in the Middle East; to reverse this situation would not only be irrational in terms of immediate matters of regional and potentially global geo-security, but also constitute a long-term threat to Israel.
So will the US withdraw its troops from Rojava? The short answer is “no.” Relinquishing Rojava and allowing the elimination of the region’s Kurds would be entirely contrary to US/Western geopolitical and geo-security interests. The Kurds may believe that they have “no friends but the mountains,” but they also know who has to act like a friend on their own soil.The writer is currently a visiting researcher at the University of Cambridge, UK.
Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>