'What happened in Jerusalem was an act of insanity and not an act of terrorism'

hot potato 224 (photo credit: )
hot potato 224
(photo credit: )
This is your chance to voice your opinion. We've chosen a controversial / interesting entry that appeared on our site (talkback, blog, etc...) and we want to know what you have to say about it. TODAY'S HOT POTATO: Taken from article: 'Perpetrator of Jerusalem attack was a murderer, not a terrorist' Talkback #: 39 Talkbacker: Lee, Dallas Text: What happened in Jerusalem was not an act of terror. Man wasn't affiliated with any terror group, but clearly was disturbed and acting alone. I'm not saying individuals can't perpetrate terror, but it's a fine line. We're nearing point where we can't distinguish between terrorism and individual acts of insanity where a person happens to scream, "Allah akbar!" We must look at the nature of each specific crime. If this were a suicide bomber, there would be no question about whether it was terror. But it wasn't, it was an insane man who took a bulldozer and drove wild through a busy street. What do you think? The ball is in your court now. Click here to respond