Dayan: “In the publications and responses of the commentators, there are personal attacks, lack of proportion and hypocrisy.”
By REBECCA ANNA STOILPublished: OCTOBER 6, 2010 03:58Advertisement
Nearly four decades after the Yom Kippur War, the response Tuesday to the release of newly-declassified government protocols proved that the wounds are still deep, although many said that they reveal little that the public did not already know about the war.Decorated former tank commander Brig.-Gen. (res.) Avigdor Kahalani, speaking on Israel Radio, said that the protocols only reinforced what the public already knew regarding the decision-making process and the general mood of the country’s leaders in the first days of the war.RELATED:'They want to conquer Israel, to finish off the Jews'War archives ‘are being sensationalized’ by pressKahalani received a Medal of Valor for service during the war, in which he drew together an amalgamated armored unit to try and stop the Syrian assault on the Golan Heights.The force succeeded, at great cost to its members, in repelling a numerically superior Syrian force in a battle later named “The Valley of Tears.”Kahalani was not alone in his assessment – Yael Dayan, daughter of then-defense minister Moshe Dayan, slammed the interpretation of the government protocols, released as part of a routine de-classification.“There is in the publications and in the responses, not in that of the public but of the commentators who certainly knew the material before it was published, personal attacks, lack of proportion and hypocrisy,” Dayan told Israel Radio.“I am angry,” she said in response to a question from interviewer Yaron Dekel about the media’s focus on her father, emphasizing that the protocols simply conveyed the same sense of fear that he had already affirmed in his memoirs.Moshe Dayan has taken much of the flack from the protocols, which critics say show that while he conveyed a confident image publicly, he panicked behind closed doors.“Right now, the situation is not good, but I hope that we will be able to stabilize.There are positions surrounded, there are many captives, more will be killed and more will be taken prisoner, and we do not know what the fate of the prisoners will be,” Moshe Dayan said during the October 7, 1973 Cabinet meeting, one day after the war began.“I propose that tonight, we give instructions to evacuate the positions that we cannot reach,” he continued. “The places that can be evacuated, we will evacuate. In places where we cannot evacuate, we will leave the wounded – whoever makes it will make it. If they decide to surrender, they will surrender. We need to tell them ‘we can’t get to you, try to break through or surrender.’” Later in the meeting, in which then-prime minister Golda Meir presided over a handful of government ministers and military officials, Dayan admitted that he “did not properly assess the enemy strength, their combat force, and [he] exaggerated in [his] assessment of our forces and their ability to withstand.“The Arabs are fighting much better than before,” he said. “They have many weapons. They hit our tanks with their personal weapons. The rockets are a serious ‘umbrella’ weapon that our Air Force cannot defeat. I don’t know whether a preemptive strike would have changed the picture in any fundamental manner.”The Cabinet considered asking then-US secretary-of-state Henry Kissenger to intervene on Israel’s behalf to pressure the UN Security Council to call a cease-fire that would stop the Syrian, Egyptian and Israeli armies at the then-current lines of combat, with Dayan opposing such a move on the grounds that “if they agree to a cease fire, [Egypt and Syria] are likely to re-start it anew – this war is over the Land of Israel.”Then IDF chief-of-staff Lt.- Gen. David Elazar joined the meeting toward the end, and offered three possible military responses: to create a temporary defensive line on a divisional scale in both the north and the south, to fall back from Sinai and maintain a defensive line at potential points of invasion or to counterattack at the Suez Canal and push forward using “the two only divisions that we have currently between Egypt and Tel Aviv” – what he called a “gamble.”Elazar noted that if that strategy failed, the war would reach Israel within two to three days.The protocols released earlier this week were a small taste of a series of transcripts expected to be published this week by the Israel State Archives after being de-classified.The ISA announced that it plans to publish transcripts of military-political consultations from the first four days of the October 1973 war, which will be available on its website to the general public starting on Wednesday.
Related Tagsmoshe dayangolda meir
var cont = `Sign up for The Jerusalem Post Premium Plus for just $5
Upgrade your reading experience with an ad-free environment and exclusive content