Led by Hans Scholl, his sister Sophie, Alexander Schmorell and Christopher Probst, the group sent letters around the world, dropped leaflets throughout Germany, and graffitied “Freedom” on the walls all over Munich.
Most of the group were fairly religious Christians. They believed that they could not continue in good conscience knowing about the barbaric atrocities the Third Reich was committing. Sophie’s boyfriend wrote to her, “We know by whom we are created, and that we stand in a relationship of moral obligation to our creator. Conscience gives us the capacity to distinguish between good and evil.” It was a paraphrase of John Henry Newman’s sermon “The Testimony of Conscience.”
Their leaflets quoted extensively from the Bible, Aristotle and Goethe. The symbol of the white rose was intended to represent purity. The group knew that in a society where thoughts and words were banned, they could face death as a result of disseminating the truth. But they felt that they could not remain silent; in the face of evil, silence was not an option.
Within days of being caught distributing leaflets at the University of Munich, they underwent faux “trials,” and three – including Sophie and Hans – were executed by guillotine. Sophie’s father, who had previously been arrested for calling Adolf Hitler the “scourge of God,” told her how proud he was of them. Han’s last words were “Es lebe die Freiheit!” Let Freedom live!
During the summer of 2020, as riots and gratuitous violence were taking over the streets of New York City, as the media and politicians on the Left spouted lie after lie after lie, as evil was being called good and good being called evil, I came across Sophie’s most famous quote: “Stand up for what you believe in even if you’re standing alone.”
It resonated. After the publication of my book The Lipstick Proviso: Women, Sex & Power in the Real World in 1997, I had been verbally bludgeoned by women’s studies professors for daring to voice two truths: Biological differences between the sexes exist and feminism only means freedom, not a laundry list of political opinions. Pre-Internet, they slammed me for heresy in print, on radio shows, in phone calls in the middle of the night. It was my first encounter with today’s thought police, and it was so ugly I moved from Washington, DC, to New York City to focus on aesthetics.
In June 2014, I was on Facebook conversing with a large group of friends in the international art world. The terrorist group Hamas captured and murdered three Israeli teens, starting yet another war. My posts up until that point mostly involved beautiful images. I had never written about Israel or even about being Jewish, but the appalling capture of the three teens struck a nerve. I waited for my more political friends to post something. To my astonishment, those in the art world took Hamas’s side. To my even greater astonishment, friends I had worked with at The New York Times, The Washington Post, The New Republic – liberal Jewish friends – posted nothing. Literally nothing.
I asked a friend of 25 years about it.
“Oh,” she said matter-of-factly, “you can’t defend Israel publicly.”
“Why not?”
“You just can’t. And if you do, I can’t be friends with you.”
Even though I’ve always been a bit shy, I’ve also always been a proud non-conformist. You demand that I do something and unless it’s the right thing to do I will most likely do the opposite. Thank good parenting, Ayn Rand, and a strong Maccabean soul, I’ve never taken orders from friends and wasn’t about to start.
I BEGAN TO defend Israel, hoping it would encourage my Jewish liberal friends to do the same. It didn’t. A few even unfriended because of those posts, and the partners of two of my best friends blocked me. Everything I had experienced in ‘97 from women I didn’t know I was now experiencing from my closest friends.
All because I dared to tell the truth.
For the next six years I defended Israel but also classical liberal values. As Quilliam founder Maajid Nawaz realized in 2007 when he was being attacked for denouncing terrorism, the Left was no longer liberal. It had become, in his words, “regressive leftist.” As a columnist for The Jewish Journal, I tried to show how leftism was illiberal, but nothing mattered; it kept getting worse. Mob justice ruled, forcing cancellations and firings; anti-journalism – propaganda – completely replaced journalism; neo-racism emerged as a state religion.
It also got very personal. Because of COVID, I was able to hear millennial teachers try to indoctrinate my 11-year-old son, just as they had been indoctrinated in college.
When the history of this period is written, it will show that there were people who resorted to violence when non-violence would have moved mountains; there were people who resorted to lies when they had the truth on their side; there were people who watched silently when their bravery was needed.
No progress ever stems from lies, violence and cowardice. What elevates and what destroys is the question that every generation has faced, and right now we are allowing the destroyers free rein.
When I saw that Sophie Scholl quote in the summer of 2020, I began to look deeper into what White Rose stood for and was able to accomplish. What was needed, I thought, was a new magazine rooted in the bravery and moral clarity of those University of Munich students; a publication independent of both parties and thus able to engage in real journalism, reporting the truth and calling out whichever side went off the extremist edge.
A publication that would also reteach the values of classical liberalism – individualism, heterodoxy, liberty, ethics – because no knowledge of those values can currently be found in newsrooms, classrooms, or even the halls of Congress. A magazine that would state unequivocally that liberalism rests on a foundation of objective truth, objective morality, and a pluralism of opinion.
Finally, a publication that shows why culture in general and art in particular must be depoliticized, and that in fact depoliticized art has the greatest ability to elevate and unite – precisely what is needed right now. A publication that would show how the principles of liberalism and aesthetics align, and why that’s not a coincidence.
“Only the brave write history,” tweeted Hassan Sajwani, when peace was formally established between Israel and the United Arab Emirates.
Indeed. And our goal is both to honor the students of White Rose, and to make them proud. Our clarion call is the same: No more silence. You’re either calling out illiberalism or covering it up; working to liberate or to suppress. Standing up for true liberalism or bowing down to fascism. It’s well past time to revive the bravery of Martin Luther King Jr., John F. Kennedy, and Golda Meir.
It’s well past time for the rebellion of freedom.
The writer is the founder of White Rose Magazine and has contributed to The New Republic, The New York Times, The Washington Post and The Wilson Quarterly, among other publications. Hailed by the New York Times Book Review as one of the “sharpest of the individualist critics,” Bloch is also the author of The Lipstick Proviso: Women, Sex & Power in the Real World (Doubleday); The Inspired Home: Interiors of Deep Beauty (HarperCollins); and the forthcoming The Elegant Soul: Love, Sex & Dignity in the 21st Century.