On Sunday morning, I found myself strolling along the Freedom Trail in downtown Boston, MA.  I had a lot of ground to cover and an early afternoon flight to catch, so I decided to rent a bike from a Hubway station.  The least time I could check out the bike for was 24 hours ($8), even though I imagine most riders use the bikes for no longer than an hour or two.  

They really should charge per hour as opposed to a flat-day rate, but for $8 I wasn't going to get worked up about it. 

Then I got back to Detroit and noticed I had a much lower debit card balance than made sense.  I scanned my charges, and realized that Hubway had charged me $101!  Surely this must be a mistake, right? 

Wrong.  I scanned their website from top to bottom and they don't offer a phone number to call (which they should) but rather a place where I can write them a message (and probably hear back in 5 days) and a list of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ's).  

One of the most popular FAQ's is "Unknown Charges":
i. $101 security hold: When you purchase a 24-Hour or 72-Hour Pass, a pre-authorization security deposit hold of $101 per bike is placed on your card account to insure against any additional usage fees you might incur. This is not a settled charge, but if you use a debit card to purchase a pass, it might result in overdraft fees if you don’t have sufficient funds in your account to cover the hold. For this reason, we recommend using a credit card when purchasing a 24-Hour or 72-Hour Pass.
Oh, so you mean that renting a bike for an hour is actually going to initially cost me $109 as opposed to the $8 you advertised?  That would have been nice to know, say, before I rented the bike!
But of course you know that if you told me that, I would have never rented the bike, so you hid that important tidbit of information from consumers in order to maximize your profits because you are the only bike-sharing service in the city and don't have competition.  You make us consent to a 133 pg. contract on a tiny little screen that you know no one reads, and put that information towards the end instead of making the $101 charge just as visible at the $8 charge.  

As of Monday at 10 AM, I still have not been issued a refund.  Imagine had I not had enough money in my account to pay parking at the airport,  check my luggage, park at school this morning etc.  This is very realistic possibility, in fact I was only a few dollars away from this being the case.  

This policy, in turn, only adversely effects low-income people, revealing Hubway's true colors.  $101 could be the difference between buying dinner for your family or not eating on a given night.   

For this, I believe five things need to happen.  

1.) Hubway must immediately paint the $101 deposit on their stations

2.) Hubway must create a separate screen that asks their customers the consent to the $101 deposit before they swipe their credit cards

3.) Government regulators must require Hubway to do the above 

4.) Another bike-sharing company should move into Boston and send Hubway out of business 

5.) Jay Walder, The CEO of MotivateCo (the company that owns Hubway) should issue a press release apologizing to all consumers like me who have been adversely effected by this scam and clearly annunciate their new policy.

I understand that none of these five steps are good for Hubway's profits and therefore they have no incentive to change.  I hope my writing of this column causes them to reconsider.  
Edit:  I wrote this on May 8th, but as of May 9th, I still haven't received the $101 back and my account is overdrafted.  Therefore, I don't have any card in which I can use to pay for parking at school.  I've noticed multiple complaints online of people who have waited 10-15 days but no luck.  I called Hubway's customer service after doing a forensic investigation for their number, and there I encountered one of the rudest people I've ever met.  I recommend Jay Walder immediately resigns!

Relevant to your professional network? Please share on Linkedin
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this blog article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or viewpoint of The Jerusalem Post. Blog authors are NOT employees, freelance or salaried, of The Jerusalem Post.

Think others should know about this? Please share