Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas will submit an application for
full membership of a Palestinian state at the UN on September 23, unless he
receives a “credible offer” for resuming peace talks with Israel, PA Foreign
Minister Riad Malki announced on Thursday.
Malki told reporters in
Ramallah that Abbas would present the request to UN Secretary- General Ban
Ki-moon so that the latter could relay it to the presidents of the Security
Council and the General Assembly.RELATED:
Palestinians say not yet decided on UN course of action
EU seeks nuanced upgrade of Palestinians' UN status
Al-Malki, PA officials paint US loser in Palestinian UN bid
Malki predicted that more countries
would declare their support for the PA’s statehood bid before next week’s
session of the UN General Assembly in New York.
He said the statehood bid
was aimed at strengthening the chances for the resumption of the peace
Malki said that neither the Quartet nor the EU had come up in
the past few days with a new and credible proposal that could pave the way for
the resumption of the peace talks with Israel.
Muhammad Shtayyeh, a
member of the Fatah central committee, accused the US and Israel of trying to
“extort” the PA financially because of the statehood bid.
doubt, however, that the US would carry out its threat to suspend financial aid
to the PA.
“It’s not in the interest of the Americans and Israelis to
have chaos in the Palestinian territories,” Shtayyeh, who is a senior adviser to
Abbas, said. “It’s not in the interest of the international community to have
turmoil in the region.”
He too criticized the US and the Quartet for
exerting pressure on the PA to force it to abandon the statehood
Shtayyeh said that the goal of those who were putting pressure on
the Palestinians was “to dissuade us from going to the UN, and not to launch
serious negotiations that would end the occupation.”
Chief PLO negotiator
Saeb Erekat said the decision to go to the UN was “irreversible.”
leadership, he added, was determined to fulfill the aspirations of the
Erekat reiterated the PA’s conditions for renouncing the statehood bid: cessation of settlement construction and Israeli recognition
of the pre-1967 lines as the basis for a two-state solution.
In New York,
Riyad Mansour, the Palestinians’ permanent observer to the UN, told a press
conference at the UN on Thursday that the Palestinians had not yet decided
whether to pursue unilateral recognition of statehood via the Security Council
or the General Assembly next week.
The final decision as to which path to
pursue will be taken “within the next few days,” he said.
options are still available to us,” Mansour said. “We are fine tuning our
options and will make the final decision soon.”
The Palestinians decision
will be announced by Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas when the
decision is made, Mansour said.
UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon
“reiterated unconditional support for the just cause of the Palestinian people”
in a letter to Mansour, in which Ban wrote that a decision about admitting
states to the UN is to be made by member states, and that “he will respect and
honor the position of member states,” Mansour said.
“We have been working
for several years to reach this moment with the international community,” he
told the gathered journalists.
“We are ready to govern ourselves in an
independent state – what we need is the end of occupation.”
two-thirds of UN member states have recognized the state of Palestine on the
lines of 1967, Mansour said. This is “almost double” the number of states that
recognize Israel and should allow “Palestine to join its proper place as a
member of the community of nations,” he said.
Mansour did not reference
the United States by name, instead noting that he was aware that a “powerful
country” would employ a veto against a unilateral bid for statehood recognition
in the Security Council.
If recognition through the Security Council
proves not possible due to US exercise of the veto, “we all know that we have a
path through the General Assembly,” he said.
“What is really clear is
that we have the right to join the community of nations as a full member, and
our quest by coming to the UN is for that objective,” Mansour said. The question
only remains of how to approach it, whether by “expressway directly to the
Security Council, or the local road, which would take us through the General
Assembly, which would eventually take us to the Security Council.
don’t have a final decision yet as to which path we will follow first. We
need to decide that first,” he said. “After we decide that, we jump immediately
into the technicalities of how it could be done and how it could be done in the
fastest possible way.
“It is an exciting time,” Mansour said.
watchers’ and US Jewish leaders’ reactions ranged from indignation to a more
“Things are still in play,” American Jewish Committee
executive director David Harris said. “No one knows exactly what the
Palestinians will do at the Security Council, or at the General Assembly, in
what sequence and with what texts – plural. It’s all still up in the
“Going to the Security Council, after Washington promised to veto,
is a PA decision to knowingly embarrass the US,” UN Watch Executive Director
Hillel Neuer said. “More and more, the Palestinian campaign is proving itself to
be an exercise in political theater, designed purely for point-scoring, that
will do nothing to improve the lives of Palestinians or Israelis.
time for President Abbas to return to the negotiating table and choose the path
of peace and reconciliation, and not endless lawfare and demonization,” Neuer
“Whatever their disclaimers about avoiding violence, the PA is
about to recklessly light a match next to a powder keg.”