Shapiro: Obama unlikely to set Iran deadline
US Ambassador Dan Shapiro cautions against expecting US president to set calendar during Israel visit.
US Ambassador Dan Shapiro at the Herzliya Conference, March 13, 2013. Photo: Courtesy of The Herzliya Conference
US Ambassador Dan Shapiro cautioned Wednesday against expecting US President
Barack Obama to set a firm calendar deadline on Iran during his visit next week,
saying there are numerous variables in play that are constantly in
Shapiro, speaking on a panel at the Herzliya Conference discussing
Obama’s upcoming visit, was responding to a Yediot Aharonot report claiming
Obama would tell Israeli leaders that if it becomes clear by October that there
is no chance for a diplomatic solution to the Iranian crisis, the US will
seriously consider an attack on Iranian nuclear installations.
difficulty in trying to pin a date down is that it is subject to very many
dynamic factors: What does the intelligence show about what is going on inside
the program? What is the evolving impact the sanctions are having, both
economically and politically inside Iran? What is happening in the talks?”
Shapiro said. “All of these are in constant flux that requires literally daily
dialogue at very high levels between our governments to make sure we are
Shapiro said that Israel and the US had a number of shared
principles on Iran, and reiterated that the two countries shared a common
understanding of the Iranian threat, a common intelligence picture and a common
goal: prevention, not containment.
Former deputy foreign minister Danny
Ayalon, during his comments, signaled that there were, however, differences.
While the US speaks of keeping Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons, Israel talks
about keeping them from obtaining nuclear capability.
“The two leaders
[Obama and Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu] should make absolutely sure that
the Iranians understand that we have a commonalty of purpose and objectives,” he
He defined those objectives as “not preventing Iran from possessing
nuclear arms, but preventing Iran from developing nuclear arms.”
said he did not believe these were “massively different principles” between the
US and Israel, and hinted that in closed discussions it was clear there is not
that wide a gap between the two countries’ positions.
Dov Zakheim – a former undersecretary of defense in the Reagan administration –
said that America’s “number one priority, apart from stopping the Iranians
themselves, is stopping this country [Israel] from an attack.”
and Israel’s timetables on Iran are “not entirely congruent,” he
“But the United States wants to be sure that if there is an attack,
it is not something the United States has to then react to. In other words, we
don’t want the tail wagging the dog. In all due respect to Israel, we are still
Zakheim said that one of the reasons the Obama visit was so
important is that it will send a message to Israel and the region that the US
has not withdrawn from the world. If Israel believes that Washington has
withdrawn from the world, he said, it will strike Iran.