Israel has made regime change in Iran its main strategic objective - opinion
Israel must recognize that success will depend on sustained US support and on a combination of military, economic, and political pressure.
Israel must recognize that success will depend on sustained US support and on a combination of military, economic, and political pressure.
The Iranian regime will remain a challenge to American and Israeli interests regardless of who occupies the White House or controls Congress in the years ahead.
The concept of a broadcaster with no allegiance to either government, shareholders, advertisers, or any specific audience demographic, whose only purpose is the truth, is worth saving.
Differences in creed do not preclude cooperation, mutual respect, or the building of peace on an Abrahamic foundation.
Iran’s ethnic minorities are the key to toppling the mullahs’ regime in Iran.
Trump's threat to end US military aid exposes a deeper crisis in Israel's alliance with America, one Netanyahu has helped create, the author argues.
Elections are precisely when voters should be able to evaluate the strategic decisions their leaders are making.
Trump's surprise announcement on US aid to Israel and Haley Stevens's break with Democrats expose a deeper divide over antisemitism, Israel, and party loyalty.
A successor less dependent on the far-right could rebuild international trust and pair force more effectively with diplomacy. Regarding Iran, the basic posture is unlikely to change.
Responsibility for tackling crime, including nationalist-motivated violence committed by Israeli citizens, should clearly rest with the Israel Police.
Haley Stevens' decision to endorse a Republican over concerns about antisemitism raises questions about Democrats' commitment to Jewish voters.