Fighting anti-Semitism
By JPOST EDITORIAL
01/27/2013 22:11
As Netanyahu noted, while the desire to annihilate the Jews has not changed since the time of the Holocaust, “what has changed is the ability of the Jews to defend themselves.”
Train to Auschwitz Photo: REUTERS
On January 27, 1945, Soviet forces liberated Auschwitz-Birkenau, the single
largest extermination camp built on European soil by the Nazi killing machine,
devoted solely to the destruction of human beings – primarily Jews. In so doing,
they revealed man’s despicable capacity for wreaking unfathomable cruelty on his
fellow human beings.
In 2005, the United Nations designated the date
International Holocaust Remembrance Day and it is recognized as such in most of
the world. Though it is the destruction of European Jewry that is remembered,
the day also has been imbued with a decidedly universal message as
well.
UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon’s speech Friday, which alluded to
bloodshed and extremist acts in Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Mali and elsewhere,
emphasized this aspect of the day.
“In a world where extremist acts of
violence and hatred capture the headlines on an almost daily basis, we must
remain ever vigilant,” Ban said.
“Let us all have the courage to care, so
we can build a safer, better world today.”
The ongoing violence among
various sects of Islam – Sunni, Shi’ite, Alawite – and by extremist Islamists
against the West is, and should be, a real concern. But it has little to do with
the Holocaust’s legacy.
In contrast, the strain of lethal obsession known
as anti- Semitism that led to the Holocaust remains viable and remarkably
adaptable to this day. This rabid, illogical hatred of Jews continues to be
built into the very DNA of extremist parties in Europe such as Greece’s Golden
Dawn party and Hungary’s Jobbik party.
But it has metastasized. Today the
most widespread – and most deadly – expressions of fanatical Jew-hatred emanate
from the Muslim world. The terrorist attacks by Islamic extremists in Toulouse
and Burgas come to mind.
As noted by Ayaan Hirsi Ali in a recent op-ed in
The New York Times titled “Raised on Hatred,” Muslims who think of Jews as
friends and fellow human beings with a right to their own state “are a minority,
and are under intense pressure to change their minds.” While there is a majority
who say they have a positive attitude toward Jews in the US (82 percent), Russia
(63%) and Western Europe – including Spain (59%) – according to a 2011 Pew
survey, in the Muslim world the picture is radically different.
Just 9%
of Muslims in Indonesia, 4% in Turkey, 4% in the Palestinian territories, 3% in
Lebanon, 2% in Jordan, 2% in Egypt and 2% in Pakistan expressed favorable
opinions of Jews. Israeli Muslims, in contrast, were more divided – as 48%
expressed favorable views while 49% expressed negative opinions.
On this
backdrop of pervasive hatred, comments made several years ago by Mohamed Morsi,
the current president of Egypt, urging followers to “nurse our children and
grandchildren on hatred for Jewish and Zionists” or that describe Zionists as
“bloodsuckers” and “descendants of apes and pigs” should come as no
surprise.
Nor should it come as a surprise that a new government study
set to be released annually every International Holocaust Remembrance Day, which
was presented by Public Diplomacy and Diaspora Affairs Minister Yuli Edelstein
to the cabinet Sunday, showed a rise in anti-Semitic attacks, especially violent
attacks by radical Islamic groups.
However, combating the sort of
Jew-hatred promulgated in the Muslim world is difficult, particularly in
academic circles, even if the dangers are obvious.
The mystery
surrounding the disappearance of the Yale Institute for the Interdisciplinary
Study of Anti-Semitism in 2011 is a case in point. Accused of “Islamophobia” and
“anti-Arab prejudice” because it dared to research and publicize Islamist
anti-Semitism, Yale shut down the YIISA (which had been established in 2006),
saying it “had not met its academic expectations.”
Too often, the
politically correct culture dominating Western academia creates an atmosphere on
campuses in which a critique of Muslim anti-Semitism is interpreted as nothing
more than apologetics for Israel. In contrast, terrorist groups such as Hamas
and Hezbollah are deemed to be “progressive” because they are
anti-Zionist.
Unfortunately, there is a tendency to overly universalize
the Holocaust or to delegitimize well-founded critiques of Muslim anti-Semitism
as Zionist apologetics.
Thankfully, as Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu
noted on Sunday, while the desire to annihilate the Jews has not changed since
the time of the Holocaust, “what has changed is the ability of the Jews to
defend themselves.”