What’s more virtuous, paying taxes or giving charity?
By RABBI SHMUELEY BOTEACH
09/20/2012 22:09
Those who want to pay more taxes are welcome to. It’s a free country. But all of us need to push ourselves to give a lot more charity.
Money Photo: Thinkstock
Obama campaign adviser David Axelrod was manhandled across cyberspace for
tweeting an attack against Republican donors Sheldon and Miriam Adelson on the
morning of September 11. Let’s be charitable here and forgive Axelrod his breech
of etiquette given that campaign has become so intense you can easily get
carried away without meaning to.
Whatever the case, Axelrod was reacting
to a report in The Huffington Post that if Mitt Romney won the election, people
like the Adelsons could save billions in taxes. The report also said that a
repeal of the estate tax could save billions more.
As the Adelsons are
arguably the world’s foremost supporters of Jewish causes and charities, this
raises for a rabbi who is also a congressional candidate the question of what is
a bigger mitzva, paying taxes or giving charity.
Surely even Axelrod, or
other critics of the Adelsons, are not suggesting the couple has a problem
parting with their money, as they regularly contribute hundreds of millions of
dollars to charity. Rather, the argument is that they should be paying higher
taxes, and the payment of higher taxes on the part of the super-rich has been a
constant campaign theme.
Mind you, even Barack Obama and Axelrod have
their limits. They are not advocating confiscatory taxation as is, say, France’s
new president François Hollande, whose plans to tax those making more than a
million euros per annum at a rate of 75 percent is already leading to an exodus
of the rich. No, President Obama wants the Bush tax cuts to expire at the end of
the year, leading to a federal tax rate of 39% for those in the highest
bracket.
But since America came into being as a protest against unfair
taxation, what rate is fair, even for the super-rich? For example, in my home
state of New Jersey a millionaire will pay, at present, 35% of his income to the
Federal government and then nearly 10% to the state, and New Jersey was changed
by Democrat governor Jon Corzine to a net-income state, meaning you cannot
deduct what you pay in Federal taxes from your state tax bill. That means about
half your income goes to taxation, and that’s before real estate tax (in New
Jersey it’s arguably the highest in America), sales tax and the myriad other
taxes we each pay on a daily basis (if you live in the US, take a look at your
monthly cellphone bill to see if you can even count how many taxes there
are).
Still, we are told that America’s taxes ought to be higher. In New
Jersey it hasn’t worked. People are leaving the state because they’re tired of
being ripped off.
So while we lost a congressional seat after the 2010
census, leading to a terribly bitter Democratic primary here in the Ninth
District, Florida and Texas, which have no state income tax, added a bunch. When
I meet people while campaigning, they tell me that taxes are the No. 1 issue for
them.
Are American citizens really expected to feel guilty about not
paying enough tax? When we see such incredible government waste, should we be
eager to fork over more money to see it so much of it squandered?
Take Obama’s
trillion-dollar stimulus that seemed to have stimulated only greater American
resentment at paying taxes. Nearly a trillion dollars was poured down a sinkhole
but produced no jobs or greater economic performance. I even remember reading a
story after the stimulus package passed in February 2008 of a public school that
was sent hundreds of thousands of dollars to spend. The school responded that it
didn’t need the money. It had good facilities and new equipment. No matter. It
was told it had to spend the stimulus funds.
I remember being deeply
upset. I’m an Orthodox Jew. I have a right to educate my children in the Jewish
tradition, just as Catholic, Islamic and Christian parents have the right to
educate their children in their traditions. I send my kids to a Jewish
day school. But not a dollar of my hard-earned tax dollars is allowed to pay a
single expense at my children’s yeshivot and Jewish day schools, even for
completely secular subjects.
Religious parents throughout the US are
having fewer children as they struggle to keep up with insanely high taxes and
insanely high tuition. Yet here was a school having our tax dollars being shoved
down its throat when it didn’t want or need the money.
And please, hold
the arguments that more money in education means a better education. In my
hometown of Englewood the school board spends approximately $23,000 per pupil,
which is about double what the Jewish day schools in the area charge per child.
Yet the failure rate in the public schools is much higher than in the private
schools.
I would much rather see philanthropists such as the Adelsons, or
Democratic mega-donors like George Soros, have a lower, fairer tax bill and give
more money to education, medical research, and private initiatives to support
the families of our troops. Charities usually spend their funds a lot more
carefully than government and I salute the efforts that president George W. Bush
made to create greater synergy between government and faith-based
initiatives.
Say what you want about Soros (whom Axelrod neglected to
mention would likewise save a bundle on lower taxes), but he has donated
hundreds of millions to Eastern European nations struggling to birth new
democracies.
Likewise, the Adelsons’ biggest critics never fail to
acknowledge the hundreds of millions they have invested in Holocaust education,
medical research, Jewish education, and support for a tiny fledgling democracy
called Israel which just happens to be America’s most stalwart ally in a region
where America is increasingly despised and loathed.
Why Axelrod would
feel it’s such a mitzva to pay higher and higher taxes is beyond me. The goal is
to make taxes fair, equitable, and effective in addressing the US’s needs. And
that means controlling spending, not just raising taxes.
And here in
America we have an incredibly proud and quite frankly humbling history of
massive charitable giving. A few names, I am sure, come quickly to your
mind as they did to me. Andrew Carnegie, for example, founded an internationally
respected institution of higher learning – Carnegie Mellon University. He set up
at least four entities of giving that are still operating today – the Carnegie
Corporation of New York; the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace; the
Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching; The Carnegie Council on
Ethics and International Affairs. This was a man whose giving was so monumental
and historic that a prehistoric dinosaur was actually named after him –
Diplodocus carnegiei.
J.D. Rockefeller gave countless dollars to promote
education at all levels and for all people. He provided major founding to
Spelman College in Atlanta for African-American women in 1884. He created the
Rockefeller Foundation in 1913, giving nearly $250 million to the foundation –
truly a staggering amount of money for the time – which focused on public
health, medical training and the arts. It helped to create the Johns Hopkins
School of Hygiene and Public Health. It also reinforced and expanded the Peking
Union Medical College in China into an institution of note.
As this is
not a history lesson I will only mention a few more captains of industry who
have left their mark on history and gave selflessly to better the world for all;
Simon Guggenheim, and more recently Bill and Melinda Gates and Mark Zuckerberg.
This is just a short list of amazing giving and great men and women, but the
list of people whose lives have been changed is beyond doubt
countless.
Great philanthropy is what we should require of the super-rich
rather than confiscatory taxation like the estate tax.
Those who want to
pay more taxes are welcome to. It’s a free country. But all of us need to
push ourselves to give a lot more charity. Being forced to pay taxes does not
make us more virtuous people. If it did, our founding fathers would have thanked
George III for his coercion. But voluntarily giving more charity makes us more
righteous, more noble, more caring and more generous.
Rabbi Shmuley
Boteach is the Republican candidate for Congress in New Jersey’s Ninth
Congressional District. The international best-selling author of 28 books, his
newest work is Kosher Jesus. Next month he will publish The Fed- Up Man of
Faith: Challenging God in the Face of Tragedy and Suffering. His website is
www.shmuleyforcongress.com. Follow him on Twitter @RabbiShmuley.