- The November 2012 UN resolution that granted observer status to Palestine as a non-member state is in effect void ab-initio due to Abbas'' lack of authority to represent all Palestinians and Hamas'' rejection of the fundamentals of the resolution.
When Hams leaders publicly reject its basic terms, one need not be a lawyer to question the validity of the November 29 UN resolution A/67/L.28 that granted observer status to Palestine as a non-member state, especially since Hamas has emerged as the dominant force in the divided Palestinian leadership as reported in the NY Times on November 24
. The report added
"In a sermonlike speech laced with Koranic verses, the Hamas prime minister, Ismail Haniya, promised on Thursday [Nov 22] to establish an independent state on all Palestine land, foreboding words from the leader of an organization whose charter prophesies Israel’s elimination. On Saturday, one of his top deputies, Mahmoud Zahar, added that Hamas would continue getting arms in preparation for the next battle and called on Arab and Muslim nations to provide Gaza with money and weapons".
Soon after beginning his celebrated December visit to Gaza, Hamas chief, Khaled Mashal, with Gaza Prime Minister Ismail Haniya at his side, publicly rejected the fundamental clause 4 of the resolution which refers to a State of Palestine living side by side in peace and security with Israel on the basis of the pre-1967 borders
In a speech described as fiery by the BBC, Mashal categorically rejected and contradicted the basis of the UN resolution. He told a cheering crowd that Palestinians will not cede any part of their land and that there is no legitimacy for Israel.
Emphasizing Hamas'' objective of ruling over all of Israel from the Jordan to the sea, he was quoted by Ma''an News Agency as telling the cheering crowds
"Today is Gaza. Tomorrow will be Ramallah and after that Jerusalem, then Haifa and Jaffa,"
In Times of Israel he was quoted as saying
“We are not giving up any inch of Palestine. It will remain Islamic and Arab for us and nobody else. Jihad and armed resistance is the only way..from the sea to the river, from north to south, we will not give up any part of Palestine — it is our country, our right and our homeland".
In effect Hamas, represented by Mashal and Haniya confirm their adherence to the Hamas Charter which declares there is absolutely no room for peaceful negotiation and that so-called peaceful solutions and international conferences are in contradiction to the principles of the Islamic Resistance Movement.
Mashal, is an influential figure who was listed by New Statesman as 18th in the list of the "World''s 50 Most Influential Figures in 2010" and his claim that Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza (WBG) as well as in Israel are all one, invalidates President Abbas'' purported authority to propose the resolution, as he did, on behalf of all Palestinians. Not only Mashal but Haniya too, claim to speak for and represent all the Palestinian people.
According to Al Arabiya,
Haniya declared that he speaks as leader of all Palestinians when he told a crowd of 30,000 Iranians in February that Hamas will never recognize Israel.
Closer examination indicates that in his November 2012 resolution in addition to 1967 lines, Abbas also referred obliquely to the 1947 partition lines. Clause 3 of the 2012 resolution asks the Security Council to consider favorably the September 2011 application, which contains the following wording
"This application for membership is being submitted on the Palestinian people''s natural legal and historic rights and based on UN GA resolution 181 (II) of 29 November 1947..."
Ma''an News Agency of Sept 16, 2011 r
eported that Hamas and Islamic Jihad dismissed President Mahmoud Abbas’ 2011 UN membership initiative and criticized a speech in which he expressed hope that peace talks would resume soon. Hamas spokesman Fawzi Barhoum said Hamas would play no part in an initiative premised on recognizing Israel.
According to a Debka file Special Report of September 16, 2011
, Abbas stressed in a speech in Ramallah that while citing the 1967 border in his intended application to UN Security Council the following week for recognition of Palestinian statehood, Israel''s "occupation" would not end the next day and much more remained to be done because the 1967 lines do not define the true borders any more than the roadblocks and the settlements. He said, the real Palestinian borders were laid down in 1947 by the UN and that all other areas are "occupied territory" which the Palestinians intend to claim.
In view of the above publicized intentions of Palestinian leaders to annihilate Israel there is tragic irony in the claim that Palestine is a peace loving nation as contained in the declaration submitted with the September 2011 application for membership, signed by the President Abbas as reproduced below.
It is evident that in proposing the above motion to the General Assembly of the UN, President Abbas purported to do so as the "sole legitimate representative of the Palestinian people" in his capacity as president of the PLO, whereas in truth and fact a substantial proportion of the Palestinian people reject his leadership. They are not only represented by other leaders they also categorically reject the very fundamentals of the resolution that was submitted purportedly on their behalf.
In the circumstances, resolution A/67/L.28 is void ab-inito and should accordingly be rescinded in the interests of justice and the status of the UN
Relevant to your professional network? Please share on Linkedin
Think others should know about this? Please share