.jpg)
A clever scheme to give away territory
“Be not over righteous, nor too clever,” Solomon, a profoundly righteous and clever king, warns Israel for all time. His words speak cogently to a sovereign Israel, at liberty after two millennia to act for the good of its people, not least in the matter of territory. If only Israel took the king’s early warning to heart. Instead, echelons of leaders and society chose to be exactly what Solomon warned them not to be: over-righteous and too clever.
Can anyone dispute that more ingenuity has gone into schemes to give away territory that Israel won against all odds than into schemes to hold onto territory for the benefit of Israel’s own people. Magnanimous is hardly the word. Foolhardy might be. I''m sure one could turn up some example, but you''d have to dig pretty deep to come up with another nation that gave away parts of an already small country to a well-disposed neighbour. To come up with another nation that handed territory on a platter to implacable foes you’d have far deeper to dig. Foolhardy is hardly the word. Nihilistic might be.
Like a child craving attention, Israel looked about for compliments only to have to ward off cudgels. “Barbaric barbarians” a celebrity just the other day called Israel for the way it conducted the latest of three mini wars in Gaza, the strip it had made a gift of to a rocket-firing, tunneling enemy. “Systematic murderers” a documentary maker called Israel for the way it stemmed waves of suicide attacks rolling in from the ‘West Bank’, Israel’s gift of real estate to bombers in human disguise.
The world forgets Israel’s open-handed sharing, yet remembers her every heavy-handed ‘disproportionate’ attack. You’d have to dig pretty deep to come up with another people that were maligned after giving away land for nothing but the holy grail of peace, land for which sons and daughters had paid the ultimate price. Ungrateful is hardly the word. Perverse might be...Or contempt, even from Israel’s big-brother ally.
So writes Harvard Professor Stephen Walz, a voice held in high regard among the American Administration’s foreign policy echelons.“The sad fact is that the United States has no appealing (Middle East) partners left today… Israel is wrapping up its latest outrage against the Palestinians - to no lasting strategic purpose. The "special relationship" with Israel also fuels anti-Americanism and makes Washington look both hypocritical and ineffectual in the eyes of much of the world.”
How bitter are the wages from being too righteous and clever. How self-defeating. How costly in hard currency. Thriving Jewish communities uprooted, economic activity disrupted, war debts incurred, worldwide Jews attacked and demonized, diplomatic ties frayed or broken. Not to forget death. Lakes of Jewish blood in Israel’s heartland, families slaughtered in Jewish settlements: products all of ingenious schemes to give away land to a terminal enemy.
Sinai was Israel’s first give-away, and the easiest. Opposition to the dismantling of Jewish communities in the Sinai was weak because it was out of sight out, of mind. No more than a vacation spot to many, Sinai was dispensable. In 1982 Israel’s own bulldozers obliterated Yamit with barely a shout.
Oslo was different. The Accords were no less than Israel’s epiphany or Road to Damascus. Oslo marked a quick and extreme conversion from old beliefs to a new faith in miraculously turning enemies into friends by giving land away. In the 1990’s land for peace became the holy of holies. Israeli acceptance of the idea of a PLO state in the so-called West Bank marked a departure from four millennia of ties to the land, two millennia of fervent longing to return to the land, and a century of Zionist endeavour.
Arch enemy Arafat was invited…no – enticed to come back and set up shop in Ramallah. There were prophetic warnings. The Lubavitcher Rebbe warned about territorial integrity. He quoted Maimonides that the beginning of all defeat is retreat. Over and over the Rebbe said that giving up territory would not lead to peace but to murdered Jews.
And so it proved. In quick time thousands of Jews paid for Oslo with their lives or their limbs. Israel paid for the scheme by being nominated for the villain’s role. Post Oslo the international community thought of Israel as Goliath and the Palestinians as the hero David armed with a sling and a stone.
Yet the fallout was nothing compared to the fallout from retreating out of Gaza. Israel’s 2005 unilateral pullout outdid its other give aways by the proverbial mile. “I have applied my mind to know …madness and folly,” said King Solomon.
Pullout from Gaza too clever by half
Of all Israel’s follies nothing surely beats Prime Minister Ariel Sharon’s brainchild. His unilateral withdrawal from Gaza began one day after the national day of Jewish mourning and wailing in the month of Av. There were dire warnings aplenty. Leaving Gaza to the Palestinians would bring calamity. Sharon went ahead, demolished twenty thriving Jewish communities and pulled the IDF out of Gaza. Misguided is hardly the word. Too clever by half may be right. The Israeli leader told American Jewish leaders in Washington that withdrawal from Gaza would,
“Reduce terror and give Israeli citizens the maximum level of security. It will increase security for the residents of Israel and relieve the pressure on the IDF and security forces.”
.jpg)
Palestinians also paid for Gaza give-away
Nine years and three mini wars later we know that what happened was the exact opposite.
When jihadist group Hamas took over Gaza from inept and corrupt PLO despots in 2007 the die was cast. Compared to the Oslo calamity, the cost in lives and limbs of the ‘Gaza give-away’ was paid most heavily by Palestinians.
For being over clever and righteous Israel paid in different currencies. Iron Dome, boots on the ground, air strikes and economic disruption were paid for in hard dollars. Hundreds of killed and wounded soldiers and family members paid their own personal price. Depopulation of towns and kibbutzim abutting Gaza may presage a permanent no-man’s land. Communities in Europe, Australia and South Africa are caught up in a maelstrom of Jew-hatred. Western media both drive and exploit anti-Semitic fever, facilitating access to campus and political platforms to bigots for peddling their filth. Historians like Robert Wistrich are looking at the beginning of the end of European Jewry.
.jpg)
Be not over-clever
It is obvious that Israel, try as it might, can please or appease no one. Defeat begins with retreat. Cruelty to kith and kin begins with consideration for your enemy. Self-inflicted wounds are the payout for being too righteous and clever.