security barrier 311.
The High Court of Justice on Thursday ordered the IDF to defend its decision to
route the security barrier through the West Bank’s Nahal Refaim Valley and
issued an injunction against further work on the barrier.
It asked the
state to explain why it had not nullified or changed the barrier’s route, and to
explain why the barrier could not be reconfigured.
It gave the IDF,
through the state, until July 2 to respond.
“This is a precedent
case...the injunction granted by the High Court forces the military to
reconsider their presumption that security concerns tramp all other issues,”
said Gidon Bromberg, Israeli director of Friends of the Earth Middle
FoEME, along with the Nature and Parks Authority as well as the
Palestinian village of Battir, which is located in the valley, had petitioned
the court against the barrier.
FoEME had told the court that placing the
barrier in the valley would destroy an ancient agricultural system that includes
terraces, pools and small canals.
The IDF, in turn, had suggested that it
could place a fence in the valley, rather than a concrete wall.
had argued that the fence would similarly harm the site’s integrity and its
ancient farming system.
The Palestinian Authority has placed the site on
its tentative list of places that it wants to register on UNESCO’s World
The IDF has said that the barrier is needed to complete
the security ring around Jerusalem to prevent suicide bombing attacks. It is
also concerned about the safety of a nineteenth-century rail line that goes
through the valley and is still operational.
In its court response, FoEME
said it believed that the line would be stopped within the next five years,
because of the nation’s new rail system.
Relevant to your professional network? Please share on Linkedin