Last remaining seats to the Jpost 2017 Annual Conference! Get your special offer now

Stanford student leader: It’s not anti-Semitic to claim Jews control media, economy

April 7, 2016 03:19

Some at Student Senate meeting also reportedly question whether the Anti-Defamation League was qualified to educate about anti-Semitism.

Stanford University

Stanford University. (photo credit:REUTERS)

A member of Stanford University’s Student Senate argued that it is “not anti-Semitism” to claim Jews control “the media, economy, government and other social institutions.”

Gabriel Knight, a junior, made the remark at a Student Senate meeting Tuesday addressing a proposed resolution on anti-Semitism, according to the Stanford Daily, the main campus newspaper. Knight also said, “Questioning these potential power dynamics, I think, is not anti-Semitism. I think it’s a very valid discussion.”

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.

He apologized later in the meeting after Jewish community leaders and a Jewish student accused him of anti-Semitism.

“I will apologize for when I supposed that [the clause] wasn’t anti-Semitic,” said Knight. “It wasn’t right for me to say that Jewish people can’t be offended by that. What I meant to say is that it’s still making a political statement, which is my problem with the clause — it’s an important conversation we should be having.”

Knight’s remarks came during a debate over language in the proposed resolution, which offers guidelines for defining anti-Semitism and calls on the student governmental body to oppose anti-Semitic activities and fund anti-discrimination education.

The resolution initially included “anti-Zionism” in its definition of anti-Semitism, a term removed in response to objections made at a meeting last week. However, several speakers at Tuesday’s meeting objected to language linking “anti-Semitism to the denial of Israel’s right to exist.”

Another point of contention was a clause that deemed demonizing, delegitimizing and applying double standards to Israel anti-Semitic, which the Senate voted to delete, saying it would restrict “legitimate criticism of Israeli policy.”

According to the Stanford Review, a campus publication that describes itself as “a political magazine that promotes independent thought at Stanford,” some at the meeting also questioned whether the Anti-Defamation League was qualified to educate about anti-Semitism.

The resolution was tabled so sponsors and supporters could assess whether or not to support it without the language that was cut.

Relevant to your professional network? Please share on Linkedin

  • Israel
  • bds
  • Middle East
  • Share this article via
    from around the web
    Related Content
    Thomas Lopez-Pierre
    April 27, 2017
    NYC council candidate's platform: Stop 'greedy Jewish landlords'


    Top Stories
    Israel Weather
    • 13 - 26
      Beer Sheva
      17 - 22
      Tel Aviv - Yafo
    • 12 - 25
      15 - 23
    • 21 - 31
      18 - 34