It’s been 25 years since the explosion at Ukraine’s Chernobyl nuclear power
station but the health implications facing the next generation are still as
serious as ever, according to the main Jewish charity working with communities
living in the region affected by what is considered the world’s worst man-made
ecological disaster.RELATED:Spurred by Japan, world pledges cash for Chernobyl
“Of course Chernobyl is not something that happened
recently, but we still see its effects every day and need to continue helping
the children living in the region labeled by the United Nations as dangerous or
contaminated,” Yossi Swerdlove, director of the Chabad movements’ Children of
Chernobyl project, told The Jerusalem Post Tuesday, the 25th anniversary of the
fatal explosion of the plants’ reactor No. 4.
According to the United
Nation’s Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR),
Chernobyl was the “most serious accident ever to occur in the nuclear power
industry,” and while it resulted in some 30 direct deaths there are estimates
that close to 100,000 have died as a result of radioactive contamination. The
effects on the local environment were also disastrous.
blind and even 25 years later it still has severe effects on the children living
in the region,” Swerdlove told the Post
, adding there is still poison in the air
and the children ingest radiation, which means – among other health problems –
that their immune system is totally shot.
Swerdlove, whose organization
has brought more than 2,730 children from the affected area to Israel since it
was formed in 1991, explained that once they “get to a ‘clean’ country, eat
healthy vegetables and are given certain medical care then they are usually
“It is not easy to get them out, we often face a lot of
bureaucracy in Ukraine, Belarus and Russia,” said Swerdlove, adding that roughly
50 percent of the children end up staying in Israel for good.
not aware of how hard the situation is there and that many of the children are
orphans whose parents died from complications of the radioactive
He added: “The children also face problems with thyroid
diseases, which can lead to cancer, and other health issues where it is
difficult to know whether they are related to the accident at Chernobyl or not.
We are still taking baby steps in understanding the effects [of Chernobyl] and
no one really knows what the long-term effects will be.”
“I believe that
what happened in Chernobyl and now [in Japan’s Fukushima nuclear plant] should
be a clear lesson about the hazards of nuclear energy,” commented Sharon Dolev
of the Movement for a Nuclear Free Middle East.
“People keep coming up
with numbers and information but we will only know the full impact of what
happened in Chernobyl in another few decades.”
Dolev said she believes
that any plans to build a nuclear reactor to enhance Israel’s electricity output
would be a mistake.
“We are sitting on the Syrian- African fault line,
just waiting for the next big earthquake to happen and we have all seen in the
last few weeks what happens when there is a big earthquake,” she
She noted that Israel already has two nuclear reactors “and we do
not know what is really happening with them because they are hidden behind the
excuse of security for [Israel’s] citizens. We have no idea who is checking
Dr. Eli Stern, head of the Center for Risk Analysis at the
Gertner Institute and a past member of at least three international committees
tasked with analyzing nuclear power plants as a result of Chernobyl, said,
however, that the new generation of nuclear power facilities seemed to be better
designed than those in Chernobyl or Fukushima.
“I am not for or against
[nuclear energy] but there needs to be some real risk assessment of the new
designs and then all the information should be put before the public for them to
decide,” said Stern, adding that despite the obvious risks and fallout there is
an argument to continue developing nuclear energy to meet the world’s growing
“If it is developed in a transparent and rational way,
with scientific and engineering checks, if it is based on social and scientific
fairness, then it will be quite the right decision,” he said.