The Supreme Court on Monday granted an appeal by the prosecution to order a
harsher sentence of 45 months in place of 24 months for a haredi man who
sexually abused his daughter at a young age – as early as when she was in third
The man, whose identity along with the victim’s identity are under
a gag order, had been sentenced to only two years by the Haifa District
Justice Neal Hendel wrote: “The father, who educated his daughters
in an exact and careful manner regarding the pillars of religion, changed his
skin in the night.”
Hendel added, “From an overall view, taking into
account the length and continuing period of the actions and the significance of
their impact on the victim, [but also] that the actions which occurred were not
that severe as a lenient consideration, it appears that the punishment which was
imposed on the appellant is not commensurate to the severity of his actions.
This is on the basis of court decisions and applicable legislative
In the underlying trial before the Haifa District Court, the
daughter, now 14, claimed that her father had sexually abused her at night while
she was trying to sleep, on an ongoing basis for three years, from third to
Her testimony was supported by her mother; her older sister
who witnessed at least one incident – the last one, in 2010; and various social
workers who interviewed all of the involved witnesses.
The father claimed
the allegations were false, stating that his daughter was too young, tired from
sleep and otherwise confused to be trustworthy.
Moreover, the father
pointed out that his version of events had no inconsistencies and was clear on
all of the details, whereas his daughter's version had inconsistencies and many
areas where she was uncertain, such as whether he had abused her throughout the
year or only during the summer months.
Even if the allegations were true,
he noted that his daughter only accused him of touching her with a finger, which
he said made the actions less severe than the crimes alleged against
The Haifa District Court accepted the daughter’s version of events
in convicting the father, because among other things, her allegations against
her father did not appear exaggerated and could have been much more severe – as
in some other cases of paternal abuse.
However, the father had been
accused of one incident of abusing the older sister, who is now 17 but was still
under 16 at the time of the allegations.
The court exonerated the father
of that allegation, finding that while most of the allegation rang true there
was enough doubt for an acquittal, since it was a one-time incident and might
have just been some kind of misinterpreted physical contact.
Stay on top of the news - get the Jerusalem Post headlines direct to your inbox!