Candidly speaking: Netanyahu messed up, but it is time to move forward

"There is currently no Israeli who has the connections, standing and ability to communicate the case for Israel with the eloquence and effectiveness in the United States as Netanyahu."

By ISI LEIBLER
LEFT-WING PROTESTERS march during a demonstration calling for the resignation of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu over police investigations for suspected corruption last week in Tel Aviv. The banner reads: ‘A corrupted government has to go.’ (photo credit: REUTERS)
LEFT-WING PROTESTERS march during a demonstration calling for the resignation of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu over police investigations for suspected corruption last week in Tel Aviv. The banner reads: ‘A corrupted government has to go.’
(photo credit: REUTERS)
Enough is enough. Since the beginning of his public life, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has been subject to the most ferocious ongoing campaign of vilification endured by any politician in the democratic world.
For two decades, Noni Mozes, the publisher of the daily Yediot Aharonot, which until recently had the highest circulation and was most influential newspaper in Israel, waged an ongoing campaign employing the worst form of character assassination, defamation and double standards aimed at achieving the downfall of Israel’s prime minister.
There were even unsuccessful efforts to introduce Bolshevik- style legislation into the Knesset making it illegal to provide the public with a free newspaper (Israel Hayom) because of its support for Netanyahu and popularity among Israeli readers. The promoters of this reprehensible legislation – political opponents and the hostile media – had the chutzpah to initiate it in the name of democracy.
Over the past few weeks, the public was shocked to learn that in the very midst of this battle with his greatest enemy, Mozes, their prime minister had actually been indulging in crude horse trading with him. The disclosure of contents of extensive taped telephone conversations between Netanyahu and Mozes prior to the last elections stunned Israelis.
Israel Hayom, the free daily newspaper whose primary shareholders are Sheldon and Miriam Adelson, had emerged as the largest Israeli daily, overtaking the giant Yediot Aharonot in circulation, and many argue it was a crucial contributor to Netanyahu’s electoral success. The tapes disclose bizarre offers from Netanyahu to Mozes to allow passage of legislation which would limit the expansion of Israel Hayom and eliminate the weekend supplement – in return for political support and a guarantee that Mozes would promote him as prime minister indefinitely.
The fact is that Netanyahu has no control whatsoever over Israel Hayom and, not surprisingly, the deal was never consummated. In his defense, Netanyahu pathetically claims that the recordings were made to protect himself from extortion by Mozes.
This deplorable demonstration of amorality by both parties nauseated Israelis of all political persuasions and reflects badly on Netanyahu’s lack of trust even in those who have been his strongest allies and supporters.
Although there is no justification for Netanyahu’s behavior, he has been treated outrageously by the media.
Since the 1990s and his first term as prime minister, Netanyahu has been confronted by a barrage of unsubstantiated, politically motivated allegations in unsuccessful efforts to discredit him.
The most virulent defamation was the despicable personal attacks on his family. The ad hominem, front-page screaming headlines day after day attacking Netanyahu, his wife and even his children go beyond what is considered “yellow press.” They reflect a total absence of moral compass and represent a disgrace to the nation.
His son was accused of being invited to fly on private jets by and receiving guest accommodation from Netanyahu admirers – hardly corruption. His wife was headlined as augmenting her income with NIS 20 weekly by “stealing” 1,000 bottle refunds for her own credit. At one stage, the prime minister’s household expenses were headlined as extravagant because of Netanyahu’s penchant for quality ice cream.
In recent weeks, there were front-page headlines about Netanyahu and his wife receiving gifts of luxurious Cuban cigars and expensive wines from well-wishers amounting to “hundreds of thousands of shekels.” The consumption of a bottle of wine per day either from “gifts” or from the household budget was considered extravagant “while poor Israelis suffered.”
Ronald Lauder, a multi-billionaire and one of world Jewry’s most generous philanthropists, is reprimanded for giving gifts that go back nearly 20 years. The hint that in return he was obtaining benefits from Netanyahu in Israel where he has invested millions of dollars in projects that were valuable contributions to the state is absurd.
Moreover, Lauder is a shareholder in Channel 10, which has been at the vanguard of defaming Netanyahu and his family.
According to Haaretz, Hollywood producer Arnon Milchan (who is reputed to have been of great assistance to Israel and is also a shareholder and board member of Channel 10) was allegedly a major contributor of pink champagne and cigars, and it was ominously disclosed that Netanyahu “had visited his Herzliya home four times.”
Winston Churchill was renowned for his luxurious cigars and for consuming huge quantities of expensive brandy. Nobody would have dreamed of challenging his lifestyle or dared to suggest that gifts of this nature could possibly have constituted criminality or corruption. No other Western leader has been subject to such concentrated, venomous attempts to portray them as despicably avaricious.
Prime ministers David Ben-Gurion and Menahem Begin were never concerned with the material quality of their lives, as was reflected by their ascetic lifestyle. Very modest homes, no cigars and no pink champagne. After them came the hedonists – Ehud Barak, Ariel Sharon and Netanyahu.
But the situation is aggravated by the double standards applied to Netanyahu compared to other prime ministers.
None of his predecessors or any past presidents have been under such hostile and obsessive scrutiny. Barak’s electoral manipulation through Isaac Herzog was quietly hushed up. Allegations of Sharon’s corruption investigation were terminated by the left-wing media when he initiated the Gaza disengagement. It was even suggested by the late David Landau when he served as editor of Haaretz that political motivations justified avoiding further investigation into Sharon’s financial affairs.
The worst example is Ehud Olmert, who, until the day of his indictment, despite evidence of huge amounts of cash being transferred to him in envelopes, was fully backed and heralded as innocent by Yediot Aharonot and the left-wing media. This even though according to public opinion Olmert had failed disastrously during the Second Lebanon War.
Despite huge pressure from the media, it is unlikely (although still possible) that Netanyahu will be indicted for corruption or criminality. But his recorded discussions with Mozes played into the hands of his foes and disgusted most Israelis.
On top of that, in addition to his social weaknesses, the use-by date for most politicians in the democratic world rarely extends beyond 10 years, which Netanyahu has exceeded.
But notwithstanding this, the fact remains that, according to all opinion polls, he currently remains vastly more popular than other potential candidates for prime minister. Israelis believe that at this moment there is nobody who could remotely fulfil the role as adequately as Netanyahu. It will be the voters of Israel – rather than the hostile media or scheming politicians – who will ultimately determine his political fate.
This applies especially now when Israel has so much at stake in relation to the incoming Trump administration which will usher in a new era that could have massive positive implications for the future of Israel.
There is currently no Israeli who has the connections, standing and ability to communicate the case for Israel with the eloquence and effectiveness in the United States as Netanyahu.
In all probability, this may be Netanyahu’s last term.
If over the next two years he succeeds in rehabilitating the alliance with the US, rationalizes the question of the settlement blocs, finds a solution to separating from the Palestinians, turns back the international tide of hostility and rebuilds relations between Israel and other civilized countries, he will go down in history as a great prime minister. His personal idiosyncrasies and the current scandal will become minor footnotes in the context of his genuine legacy.
Most Israelis, notwithstanding their exasperation, recognize this. Despite the obvious stains in Netanyahu’s lifestyle (and assuming that he will not be indicted for criminality or corruption), we should hope that, in the national interest, this obnoxious issue will be brought to an end and we should close ranks in support of his forthcoming efforts on our behalf in the United States.
We should pray for the success of Netanyahu’s efforts to achieve our long-term goal of peace and security during this critical turning point in our relationship with the new US administration.
The author’s website can be viewed at www.worldfromjerusalem.com.
He may be contacted at ileibler@leibler.com.