Reality Check: Getting back to the negotiating table
10/14/2012 22:45
Once America’s next president is installed, a new government is established in Jerusalem and the Syrian crisis resolves itself one way or another, there will be a pressing need for Israel to seek a return to the negotiating table.
Tahrir Square Photo: Reuters
Guess who wrote this and where it was first published: “The Arab Spring showed
the world that the Palestinians are happier and in [a] better situation than
their Arab brothers who fought to liberate them from the Israelis. Now, it is
time to stop the hatred and wars and start to create better living conditions
for the future Arab generations.”
No, not some American neo-con writing
in The Weekly Standard. Rather, these are the words of Abdulateef al-
Mulhim, a former commodore of the Saudi Navy, in an article first published
earlier this month in Arab News, a Saudi Arabian English-language
newspaper.
And Mulhim had more to say: “If many of the Arab states are in
such disarray, then what happened to the Arabs’ sworn enemy [Israel]? Israel now
has the most advanced research facilities, top universities and advanced
infrastructure. Many Arabs don’t know that the life expectancy of the
Palestinians living in Israel is far longer than [Arabs in] many Arab states and
they enjoy far better political and social freedom than many of their Arab
brothers. Even the Palestinians living under Israeli occupation in the West Bank
and Gaza Strip enjoy more political and social rights than some places in the
Arab World.”
The gist of Mulhim’s article, headlined “Arab Spring and the
Israeli enemy,” is that the Arab world has wasted hundreds of billions of
dollars, at the cost of tens of thousands of lives, fighting Israel, when the
Arab world’s real enemies are “corruption, lack of good education, lack of good
healthcare, lack of freedom, lack of respect for the human lives” as well as the
many Arab dictators “who used the Arab-Israeli conflict to suppress their own
people.”
NOW THIS is music to many Israeli ears and, in many respects,
Mulhim’s analysis is correct. Israeli Arabs do have a better life
expectancy than Arabs in many other Arab states, enjoying the benefits of a
Western democracy even if they do face all sorts of unwritten discrimination in
everyday life. And yes, the Israeli-Arab conflict has been used by despots the
Arab world over as a means of distracting their people from seeking social
justice closer to home.
But just as Mulhim asks his readers “what was the
real cost for not recognizing Israel in 1948 and why didn’t the Arab states
spend their assets on education, healthcare and the infrastructures instead of
wars?” we Israelis also need to ask ourselves some hard questions and not just
bask in the flattering comparison Mulhim drew between Israel and our Arab
neighbors.
In particular, we need to ask ourselves what has been the cost
of our ignoring Arab peace overtures, starting from Golda Meir’s intransigence
in the face of Anwar Sadat’s feelers, which led to the 1973 Yom Kippur War and,
more recently, our failure to engage with the Arab peace initiative first
proposed in 2002 at the Beirut Summit and re-endorsed at the Riyadh Summit in
2007.
Initially, the Arab peace initiative was simply ignored in Israel
due to the horror of the Seder Night massacre at the Park Hotel in Netanya,
which took place the day before the initiative was published at the height of
the second intifada.
But since the end of the intifada, no Israeli leader
has seriously engaged with this proposal which offers, in return for total
Israeli withdrawal of territories captured in the Six Day War, the establishment
of a Palestinian state and a “just settlement” of the Palestinian refugee issue,
full recognition of Israel by the whole of the Arab world.
Obviously,
there are serious problems with the Arab League’s “take-it-or-leave-it approach”
regarding the initiative. Any peace agreement between Israel and our Arab
neighbors has to be the result of negotiations and not simply one side setting
conditions for the other to fulfill.
But the initiative did mark a
watershed moment in terms of the Arab world’s preparedness to accept Israel’s
place in the Middle East, and as such needs to be examined more seriously by
Jerusalem than it has been to date.
With Israel about to enter election
frenzy for the next three months, a US election campaign reaching its peak and
the Arab world in disarray following the events of the Arab Spring and turmoil
in Syria, it is clear that now is not the time to be looking for any new
diplomatic moves to break the stalemate. But once America’s next president is
installed, a new government is established in Jerusalem and the Syrian crisis
resolves itself one way or another, there will be a pressing need for Israel to
seek a return to the negotiating table.
If not, within a few years, there
will be plenty of Israeli Abdulateef al-Mulhims writing about the tragic cost to
the Jewish state of not having reached a peaceful accord with the Arab
world.
The writer is a former editor-in-chief of The Jerusalem Post.