Since 9/11, the West’s perception of violence perpetrated in the name of a
warped interpretation of Islam has changed. No longer can this violence be seen
as an exclusively external threat faced by countries located in the Middle East
such as Israel. Rather, it is a domestic threat as well.
This lesson was
driven home yet again for Brits on Wednesday when Michael “Mujaheed” Adebolajo
and an accomplice brutally murdered a man in broad daylight on a London street
while shouting “Allahu akbar.”
The victim, a British soldier, was wearing
a T-shirt with the slogan “Help-the Heroes,” which is also the name of an
organization that supports British forces fighting in Afghanistan and
Mali.
The vast majority of Muslims in Britain and in other European
countries are law-abiding, upright citizens who are undoubtedly appalled that
the two men have claimed to be acting in the name of Islam. The Muslim Council
of Britain was quick to denounce the atrocity.
Nevertheless, Britain and
other European countries do have a problem with radical Islamists. And they have
for some time now.
“Londonistan” apparently originated as an appellation
used in the 1990s by French security officials frustrated at British leaders’
failure to confront in their capital the dangers of radical Islam, which, the
officials feared, would spill over into France. Steven Simon, a former White
House counterterrorism official, referred to London as “the Star Wars bar
scene,” that caters to all kinds of Islamist recruiters and fund-raisers for,
and practitioners of, holy war.
Abu Hamza al-Masri, the imam of the
Finsbury Park Mosque in central London, provided shelter to Richard Reid, a.k.a.
“the Shoe Bomber,” and Zacarias Moussaoui, a member of the team that carried out
the 9/11 attacks, and other terrorists.
The 2002 video butchering in
Pakistan of Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl was organized by Ahmed
Omar Saeed Sheikh, another Brit and a former student at the London School of
Economics. A year later, Asif Mohammed Hanif and Omar Khan Sharif, both born in
England, took part in a suicide attack on Mike’s Place, a Tel Aviv
bar.
British authorities have taken steps to crack down on extremists.
Abu Hamza was eventually jailed on charges of soliciting murder and inciting
racial hatred. In March of this year, Jamaican-born Abdullah El-Faisal, a
supporter of al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden, was sentenced to nine years in
jail for urging his followers to kill nonbelievers in a holy war.
Some
radical Muslim clerics have managed to manipulate Britain’s democratic system.
At the end of March, police said they were unable to prosecute Anjem Choudary
for saying that British Prime Minister David Cameron and US President Barack
Obama should be killed. After the British daily The Sun provided authorities
with secretly filmed footage, Choudary claimed he had been “joking,” though he
maintained that bin Laden was his “hero.”
In the wake of the brutal
murder on Wednesday, Choudary said he was acquainted with Adebolajo, who
converted to Islam in 2003. According to The Telegraph, Adebolajo appeared
publicly alongside other radical members of Islamist group Al-Muhajiroun, the
banned forerunner to 4 UK, which was headed by Choudary.
Commenting on
Adebolajo’s act of terrorism, Choudary said: “What he did was unusual and it’s
not the kind of view that I propagate and I do not condone the use of violence,
but those views are out there. Some members of the Muslim community struggle to
express themselves and he is making his voice heard in blood.”
Clerics
such as Choudary walk a thin line between criminal incitement and freedom of
expression. And his messages enjoy a remarkably receptive audience in a country
where the fastest growing religion is Islam. In a 2006 survey commissioned by
Channel 4, a quarter of British Muslims said the July 7, 2005, bombings in
London that left 52 dead were justified because of the British government’s
support for the war on terror. Muslims under 24 were twice as likely to
agree.
There is no evidence that these sorts of sentiments among some
Muslims have significantly changed. In an atmosphere in which murderous
terrorist attacks are see as justified, the sort of seemingly random lone wolf
attack perpetrated by Adebolajo and his accomplice becomes all the more likely.
It should come as no surprise that random terrorist attacks have been, and will
remain for the foreseeable future, MI5’s greatest security threat.
Relevant to your professional network? Please share on Linkedin
Think others should know about this? Please share
|
|