Sir, – In the same issue of The Jerusalem Post
, two articles appeared, both
concerned with praying.
One deals with righteous anger at the brazen
discrimination practiced against religious Jews by not allowing them to even
move their lips when visiting the Temple Mount, lest they be guilty of praying
(“A place for Jews on the Temple Mount,” Fundamentally Freund, Comment and
Features, October 18). When a policeman was asked why Jews were barred from
praying, his reply was “It would upset the Arabs.”
The second piece deals
with the arrest, humiliation and jailing overnight of a woman who dared to sing
Shema Yisrael at the Kotel (“Women of the Wall leader arrested for singing at
the Kotel,” October 18).
The moving force behind this latter outrage are
these same Orthodox Jews (see above) who cannot tolerate the prayers of women in
public, and who demand that women not be permitted to drape themselves in the
same “tallitot” as men, etc.
I wonder what a policeman would reply if he
were questioned as to why woman were barred from praying? Possibly, “It would
upset the Jews?” The fact that at long last we have our own state is no reason
to run it like a dictatorship.MARCELLA WACHTEL
Sir, – I had to
reread the article about Anat Hoffman being arrested for singing at the Kotel a
few times before I could take in its meaning.
This is an offense
punishable by being arrested? What kind of society are we living in? When was
such a law passed? Who are these religious “leaders” who are responsible for
such an action? Hoffman’s description of the treatment meted out to her is
pretty disgusting, not to say “unbelievable.”
This is Israel? Where
someone decided that a woman is less than a man and cannot be allowed to sing at
the Kotel? Surely I didn’t vote for a government that would pass such a law!
Let’s make sure that this time we get a government that is at least tolerably
free of such a mind-set.LEONARD ZURAKOV
Sir, – On October 18 The
wrote “For security reasons the IDF and the Border Police want to
discourage worshipers from walking to and from the tomb over Shabbat” (“120,000
visitors expected at Rachel’s Tomb”).
“[MK Yulia] Shamolov Berkovich
traveled down the winding road flanked by two high concrete walls that protect
the worshipers from ‘Palestinians’ in Bethlehem. Then she saw the tomb,
protected by barbed wire and a guard tower.
Tears fell from her eyes as
she described how hard it was to see those walls.”
My reaction when I
visited the site of Rachel’s Tomb some two years ago was almost identical except
that along with the tears I expressed outrage at how this could happen in a
When I was there, the tears from myself and the visitors
flowed freely with all kinds of prayers to our mother Rachel, but what bothered
me was how meekly the people accepted being herded in and out after what the
police deemed a reasonable time.
They do this due to there always being
the high probability that our “peace partners” could attack, and the police do
not want to get into a confrontation with the enemy, after all they regard
everything in this land as theirs with the Jewish people the illegal occupiers.
We certainly do nothing to make them think otherwise.
We shame ourselves,
our country, our forefathers/foremothers and we show the world that we can be
trampled on with barely a wimper, that we are prepared to be subservient to an
enemy that is a clear and present danger and is allowed with impunity to make
our lives a living hell.
For the sake of the children if nothing else,
lets give them a life.YENTEL JACOBS
Sir, – “Hatikva,” our
national anthem, avers that our hope of 2,000 years of being a free nation in
the land of Zion and Jerusalem has not yet been lost. Yet, as Michael Freund
wrote in his October 18 op-ed, our fainthearted leaders at the end of the Six
Day War willingly ceded our sovereignty over the Temple Mount to the Muslim Wakf
who today practice anti-Jewish racism with the full cooperation of our own
government! It is absolutely absurd when anyone but Jews can freely access and
pray on the Temple Mount.
All this was done in order not to disturb the
sensibilities of the Muslims in total disregard of the sensibilities of the
The time has come for Israel to behave like a free and sovereign
nation and establish its authority over the site that is most holy to the Jewish
people.HAIM M. LERNER
Sir, – I was one of the privileged
members of the group from Ra’anana to ascend the Temple Mount with Michael
The days leading up to our trip were filled with many mixed
emotions and feelings as this has been something that I have yearned to do for
Though I knew that I would very disappointed by the inability
to pray or demonstrate any religious expression, I could not stay
Our group arrived at the entrance ramp to the Temple Mount and had
our passports and Israeli ID’s checked. There was a 20- minute delay in entering
which cut short our one hour allowable visit to about 40 minutes.
course, the Muslims are permitted to stay on the Mount as long as they wished,
or so it seemed to me.
The fact that we were surrounded by Israeli-Arab
police and watched very carefully by several members of the Muslim Wakf made it
seem that we were in an area ruled more by an Arab state than by our own Jewish
Israeli government. It also was quite evident that only religious Jews are
treated this way as non- Jews and non-religious Israelis were moving around much
How could this be? Living in a Democratic country that
boasts freedom of religious expression for all especially Christians and
Muslims, we were not permitted to utter a single religious verse or even show
any display of connecting with our creator on the holiest place on earth for the
Dear Mr. Prime Minister: Why ask the Arab nations of the
world to call Israel a Jewish country when its citizens are not allowed to
express any form of Jewish connection to our Holiest place on earth? Is “Har
Habayit Beyadeynu” (Temple Mount is in our hands) really a reality or just a
famous cliche? Let us all pray for the freedom to pray on our holiest place on
earth just as other religions are free to do so.JONATHAN SURASKY
Sir, – The articles by Daniel Tauber “Where Prayer is a Crime” (Comment
and Features, October 17) and Michael Freund “A place for Jews on the Temple
Mount” (October 18) are to be commended.
The present situation is
It is high time that Jews are permitted to pray in their most
sacred place – the Temple Mount in Jerusalem – a practice which should not be
compromised by threats of violence by adherents to other
Tolerance should be felt, and shown, by members of all
religions to each other, and the Temple Mount should not be considered exclusive
to any one religion.
My late Father always maintained that if we Jews do
not have respect for our own religion, then we cannot expect those of other
religions to respect ours.
Perhaps with elections on the horizon our
politicians will reconsider the present unacceptable situation.JACKIE
Stay on top of the news - get the Jerusalem Post headlines direct to your inbox!