The question, one of too many, begs to be asked, again: Why have some American
Jewish leaders joined the US administration in pushing for the establishment of
a Palestinian Arab state, when in fact, such a policy has been tried – and has
failed – for as long as Israel has itself been a state? What has really changed
since the Palestinian Arabs rejected the concept of two states coexisting one
with the other 65 years ago? Are we also to now believe, after two generations
of hostility directed at ending the Jewish state, that the antagonists have now
reconciled to Israel’s existence? And further: Will they now accept that the
land to be ceded by Israel will sufficiently resolve the conflict, contrary to
the ever-present Arab maximalist ideological demands, and truly agree to live in
peace? Yes, there are more questions than answers.
Is it not obvious from
the land concessions already exacted from Israel that no panacea was found via
the generation-old “land for peace” formula? Instead, we find the Palestinian
Authority areas and Gaza portending the foundation of a terror state, while
ignoring virtually all obligations – written agreements and otherwise – and
continuing with their not-so-thinly-veiled goal to destroy Israel. Is it not
obvious that pushing for a Palestinian state will not lead to peace but rather
to further opportunities to launch new terrorism and perhaps another war? Is
there anyone who seriously believes a Palestinian state will help Israel’s
security? As Deputy Foreign Minister Ze’ev Elkin stated: It is obvious, if the
truth matters, that Oslo and Disengagement made it Israel’s geopolitical
position more dangerous.
How would giving the Palestinian Arabs more land
better Israel’s security position if it has not tempered their vitriol against a
state that they still refuse to recognize as “Jewish.” The honest, albeit not
popular, answer is it obviously would not.
Accordingly, the only
remaining argument of those supporting a Palestinian Arab state is
It is astounding that so many are making this argument, for
several obvious reasons. First of all, Gaza is controlled by Hamas and all but
50,000 Arabs in Judea and Samaria are controlled by the PA. Simply stated, there
is no demographic concern if the status quo is maintained.
demographics only matter if Israel takes back the Palestinian Arab areas of
Judea and Samaria and/or Gaza or, of course, if Hamas or the PA unilaterally
This may happen at some point in the future, but is not
currently the case. If anything, Israel’s taking back these areas is actually
made likely if the Palestinian Arabs are given a state which would serve as a
launching base to try and destroy Israel – certainly more so than if the status
quo was maintained.
An obvious example is Sderot, which was more secure
before Disengagement. The assaults, with rockets raining down on its citizens,
engendered the calls for Israel to retake Gaza. Was anyone truly surprised?
Therefore, those advocating a Palestinian state, basing themselves on the
inevitability of demographics, are assuming that if such a state is not created,
the current status quo will be altered – and the main change they fear is the PA
dissolving. No one seriously believes that Hamas will dissolve on its own. Nor
will the PA, for that matter, certainly not while its leadership profits so
greatly from the extraordinary corruption and the correlative benefits of
However, even were it to happen, the demographics still show
Israel having a 66 percent to 34% advantage of Jews to Arabs. Demographic
Further, the birth rate of Jews and Arabs are now
almost identical with Jewish births trending upward and Arab births downward.
Israel also has net immigration and currently the PA has net emigration. The
answer to some of those earlier questions is clear – there is no demographic
A further argument was raised. What must be done about the
Palestinian Arab rights and their stated desire for a state? Not every minority
has a state or a right to a state – ask the Kurds – and the Palestinian Arabs
are a minority in Israel even with Judea and Samaria included in that
calculation. Israeli Arabs have voting rights. To cite here a debate being
argued elsewhere ,we see that in US the forces opposing immigration reform
positing that those not legitimately part of the country, and who don’t pose any
danger (as do the Palestinians in the territories) should not be allowed to
become citizens and vote only 13 years from now, as the proposed US Senate bill
Not to be ignored in this discussion: Israel should also
pursue a policy of more aggressively encouraging aliya, encouraged by polls that
show upward of 50% of the Jews of Europe having contemplated
Finally, I offer an answer to a question that no one seems to ask.
Since the goal of the Palestinian Arabs is the eradication of Israel, anyone
proposing anything short of that is not proposing a solution. Rather they ignore
the most fundamental fact of the conflict – the Arab refusal to accept Israel’s
right to exist.
So we muddy the waters in addressing the issue of what to
do in the current situation. The answer understandably troubles the
peace-makers; proceeding with a Palestinian state will not resolve the conflict
and will only makes things worse.The author, an attorney, is the
president of the National Council of Young Israel.
Stay on top of the news - get the Jerusalem Post headlines direct to your inbox!