America’s best investment
By MICHAEL HARRIS
10/22/2012 21:51
Despite the polarizing partisanship that dominates US political discourse, military aid to Israel is one of the few programs that has virtual universal support among US lawmakers.
Surprise IDF drill in the North Photo: REUTERS/Baz Ratner
Despite the polarizing partisanship that dominates US political discourse,
military aid to Israel is one of the few programs that has virtual universal
support among US lawmakers. Why is this one of the few programs that
receives widespread bipartisan support?
This 30 billion dollars of aid, provided
to Israel over the course of 10 years, requires that the US spend a mere
fraction of its annual budget (well under one percent of total spending). In
return, the American people receive unquestionably large benefits.
Israel
is America’s best ally in the Middle East, and this aid has been used to improve
the strength of the IDF. A strong Israel has helped to support US national
security interests without sending US soldiers into combat. In other words,
America has kept many of its troops out of harms way and simultaneously secured
its strategic interests.
Israel’s ongoing fight against Islamic terrorist
groups, which actively target US civilians, is one of the most impressing
success stories of US security assistance to Israel. Between 2008-2009 the IDF
launched Operation Cast Lead against Hamas, and a similar operation in 2006 was
initiated against Hezbollah. If Israel does not have the necessary resources to
combat Islamic terrorism, then the effects could be devastating for the United
States. It may even drag America into another war.
In the cases of Hamas
and Hezbollah, the US could be forced to deploy troops into both the Gaza Strip
and Lebanon to safeguard American national security. However, if US
military aid to Israel is maintained, then the likelihood of such a scenario
dramatically decreases.
The costs of another Middle Eastern war, which
would be a disaster for the United States, should be enough of a reason to keep
the security assistance. Both Democrats and Republicans are trying to
achieve economic recovery, yet multiple wars against various terrorist groups
would increase defense spending, widen the budget deficit, and hurt economic
growth.
Furthermore, a militarily weaker Israel may increase the
likelihood of war between the US and various enemy states in the region. For
instance, states like Iran have been deterred until now to close the Strait of
Hormuz, a waterway where large amounts of the world’s petroleum is
traded. However, a weakening of America’s best ally in the region may
lead Iran to change its mind and to close the strait.
This would leave
the United States with a unbearable choice; should it initiate a war against
Iran and spend hundreds of billions of dollars, or should it allow the closure
of the strait and deal with a massive surge in oil prices? Both of these
scenarios could bring America back into a recession, and possibly reopen old
economic wounds that had originally induced the financial crisis.
The
possibility of a nuclear armed Iran also shows the necessity of US-Israel
security cooperation. The most recent round of negotiations between western
powers and Tehran had shown that a possible Israeli military strike against
Iran’s nuclear facilities, combined with crippling sanctions, had nearly forged
a diplomatic compromise that almost brought a peaceful end to Iran’s nuclear
ambitions.
If the US continues to transfer weapons to Israel to pressure
Tehran, then Iran may calculate that the costs of attaining a nuclear weapon
are greater than the benefits and renounce its program
altogether.
Additionally, approximately 75% of this aid must be spent
within the United States, so countless Americans have a job because of this
international transfer of military equipment. An elimination, or even a
reduction in this aid, would raise the unemployment rate among one of the most
skilled sectors in the American workforce.
This aid’s contribution to
American national security and economic growth is compelling, yet these benefits
are also justified by a moral imperative. Unlike other recipients of US aid,
which are often autocratic and dictatorial regimes, Israel shares common values
with the United States. Israel continues to be the only democracy in the Middle
East, and the ethos of the country is based on the key values of gender
equality, religious tolerance, and freedom of expression.
If
bipartisanship is dead, then US security cooperation with Israel is a clear
exception to the rule. As America navigates through a recovering economy and a
tumultuous Middle East, it is becoming clear that this aid will stay in place
for a very long time. It may be America’s best investment to date.
This
writer is the President of TorchPAC, the Pro-Israel Political Organization at
New York University. You can email him at michael.harris@nyu.edu.