The case for the reelection of President Barack Obama is compelling for several
important reasons.
Let me begin with our future and the future of our
children. The composition of the US Supreme Court over the next 30 years may be
decided during the next four years. There are now three justices who will turn
80 and one who will be close to 80 during this coming presidential
term.
The remaining justices – including conservative Chief Justice John
Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito – are relatively young. Whoever is elected the
next president may get to appoint as many as four justices in their 40s or 50s.
These justices may well serve 30 or more years on the High Court, and if they
are as reactionary as the current young justices, will form a firm and long
lasting majority.
Republican candidate Mitt Romney has said that he would
fill the Supreme Court vacancies with justices like Alito, Antonin Scalia and
Clarence Thomas. A court with such a right-wing majority will change America for
the worse. It will dismantle the wall of separation between church and state and
embolden those who seek to Christianize America. It will eliminate a woman’s
right to chose abortion and will set back the trend toward equality for all
Americans regardless of sexual orientation. It will continue to strike down
progressive legislation, such as gun control, campaign reform and laws
protecting the rights of minorities.
Few Americans, as a matter of
history, vote on the basis of who will be nominated to serve on the Supreme
Court and other federal courts. More should do so because our third branch of
government is every bit as important as the first two branches and has
considerable influence on the lives and liberties of Americans. The case for
Barack Obama includes his record in appointing moderates rather than right-wing
ideologues to the judiciary, and most especially to the Supreme
Court.
The case for Barack Obama also includes his approach to foreign
policy, which has improved the standing of America around the world. Under the
Bush administration many of the US’s strongest allies became alienated by
America’s unilateralism. The Obama administration has worked closely with our
allies to impose the harshest possible sanctions on Iran, to depose Muammar
Gaddafi and to help keep the Arab Spring from turning into an extremist Muslim
winter.
President Obama also succeeded in killing Osama bin Laden and
crippling al- Qaida. It is clearly a work in progress but it is moving in the
right direction.
With regards to Iran, which poses the most immediate
threat to the security of the United States and its allies, most especially
Israel, the policy of the Obama administration is crystal clear: It has taken
containment off the table and kept the military option on the table. Everyone
hopes that the military option will not have to be employed, since it would
entail considerable loss of life, especially among Israeli civilians who would
be targeted by Hezbollah rockets fired in retaliation against any attack on
Iran.
But the best way to avoid the need for military action is for the
Iranian mullahs to believe that the United States will never allow them to develop nuclear
weapons. If they believe that reality then the pain of the sanctions will
pressure them to give up their nuclear ambitions. President Obama has clearly
stated that he is not bluffing when he says that his administration will never
allow Iran to develop nuclear weapons. A secondterm president generally has more
credibility than a firstterm president when it comes to threatening military
action.
The Obama administration has strongly supported Israel’s security
by helping to construct the Iron Dome anti-rocket system, by backing Israel’s
responses to rocket attacks from Gaza and by coordinating closely with its
military.
When it comes to reenergizing the moribund peace process
between Israel and the Palestinians, Romney has said that he would do nothing
other than kick the can down the road.
President Obama, on the other
hand, would almost certainly try to bring the parties together to achieve a
two-state solution that guaranteed Israel’s security while allowing the
Palestinians to govern themselves.
Finally, the case for Obama’s
reelection should focus heavily on how much better the US economy is doing today
than it did under his predecessor. A recent report by the International Monetary
Fund establishes that the United States leads all other wealthy nations in the
recovery from the deep recession of the past several years. The revitalization
of the automobile industry has produced many jobs and the trends are looking in
the right direction for greater job creation throughout the country. Moreover,
the Obama program promises more equality in taxation, more allocation of
resources to education, and a healthier America with better access both to
healthcare and to insurance. A well-educated and healthy America is a good
prescription not only for more jobs but also for better jobs and for keeping
good jobs at home.
All in all, the case for the reelection of Barack
Obama is a compelling one, based not only on his record but on the specific
policies he has proposed for the next four years.
President Obama has
earned my vote on the basis of his excellent judicial appointments, his
consensus-building foreign policy and the improvements he has brought about in
the disastrous economy he inherited.
The writer is a Harvard law
professor and political commentator.
|