As US and Western forces prepare for what looks like imminent action in Syria,
the debate over the chemical strike in Damascus continues.
of intervention argue, would President Bashar Assad have carried out a strike of
this kind when he was already making headway in his war against the rebels? And
why might he have done so at a time when UN chemical weapons inspectors were in
the country? But whatever the advisability of a Western strike on Syria, the
notion that a regime attack using chemical weapons in eastern Ghouta is in any
way implausible or outlandish is entirely incorrect.
To understand why,
it is necessary to observe both the regime’s general strategy for prosecuting
the war, and the previous, officially verified instances of its use of chemical
Regarding regime strategy, it is a misrepresentation to claim
that Assad is “winning” the war against the rebellion.
The regime has
certainly rallied since the moment, late last year, when it looked like the
rebel assault on Damascus was about to commence.
But recent Assad
victories in Qusair and Khaldiyeh in the west do not represent a general change
in the fortunes of the war. Nowhere in the country is the regime reconquering
vast swathes of rebel held territory. Rather, the Qusair and Khaldiyeh battles
were about regime consolidation of the lines of control, transportation and
communication around the roughly 40 percent of Syrian territory over which it
rules. This process is ongoing.
The rebels, meanwhile, have been carrying
out a similar consolidation process of their own in recent weeks.
most significant development in this regard was their capture of Minnagh air
base in largely rebel-held Aleppo province this month.
In this context,
the notion that Assad’s army might choose the rebel held suburbs of eastern
Ghouta as the next battle to be fought is entirely plausible. Largely unnoted by
Western media, the rebels have been engaged in an offensive from the eastern
suburbs of Damascus city, of which eastern Ghouta forms a part, since July
As a well-connected Syrian rebel source described to this reporter
last week, the rebels were making slow headway, pushing from eastern Ghouta
further into regime-controlled areas of the city. Assad’s attempts to hit back
had proven insufficient. Jobar, the area of eastern Ghouta where the chemical
attack took place, is referred to by both sides as the “key to Damascus” –
control of which is of crucial importance.
With the Khaldiyeh battle
concluded successfully, it would make perfect sense for Assad to then proceed to
the next order of business – namely, a concerted attempt to drive the rebels out
of eastern Ghouta and away from Damascus.
The chemical attack on eastern
Ghouta appears to have formed part of the opening move of this
Given the scale of the loss of life, some form of
miscalculation may have been made, as is now suggested by the latest revelations
of intercepted conversations of Syrian officials following the
But the scale aside, it is important to remember that on a number
of verified occasions over the last year, the Syrian regime has employed
chemical weaponry as a tool of tactical combat.
Sterling reporting work
by two Le Monde reporters, who spent two months in the eastern Ghouta area in
April and May of this year, revealed several earlier instances of attacks on the
area during this period in which chemical agents were employed.
French government tested materials brought out of the country by the reporters
at the government’s Du Bouchet facility. In all, 14 samples were tested; 13 of
these came from the Damascus area, and an additional sample came from a chemical
attack in Saraqeb in Idleb province. Following these tests, French Foreign
Minister Laurent Fabius concluded there was “no doubt” that the regime and its
accomplices had “used sarin.”
Britain, too, has drawn similar conclusions. Journalists from The Times, working in the Sheikh Maksoud
neighborhood of Aleppo and the Afrin hospital near the Turkish border this past
April, also observed the apparent effects of chemical weapons use.
smuggled out of the country and tested at the British government’s Defense
Science and Technology Laboratory at Porton Down similarly confirmed that sarin
had been used.
All of this shows that the assault on eastern Ghouta on
August 21 did not represent a departure from previously confirmed tactics
employed by the Assad regime, except in the scale of the attack.
sense, from the point of view of its own strategy and that of the rebels, for
Assad’s army to begin an assault on eastern Ghouta at that time. Previous
evidence confirmed by the laboratories of two key Western countries – the UK and
France – shows that the regime has used chemical weapons in the past.
whatever the rights and wrongs of action against the Syrian regime, the attack
on Jobar in eastern Ghouta conformed with the observable pattern of regime
behavior over the course of this year.
That is to say: Assad has been
using his chemical weapons capability to kill his own civilians for quite a
Crisis in Syria - full JPost.com coverage