Adoption and faith
By JPOST EDITORIAL
06/17/2012 22:18
Childless Israeli couples interested in adoption inevitably face the prospect of adopting a non- Jewish child.
multitasking, mom, mother Photo: Thinkstock/Imagebank
Childless Israeli couples interested in adoption inevitably face the prospect of
adopting a non- Jewish child.
The strong ethos of childbearing in our
society, which puts pressure on childless couples to do everything in their
power to have a child – whether via artificial insemination, surrogate mother or
adoption – also creates a situation in which there are very few children – if
any – up for adoption. Add to that the ample availability of free abortions and
the result is a serious dearth of adoption options locally.
Israeli
couples who decide to adopt are forced to look elsewhere for prospective
children in Romania, the Ukraine or elsewhere. And these children are rarely, if
ever, Jewish.
It used to be that in order to adopt a child abroad, the
adopting parents had to convert the child to Judaism. This was in accordance
with section 5 of the Adoption Law which states that “the adopter shall be of
the same religion as the adoptee.”
But after signing on to the Hague
Convention on Protection of Children and Cooperation in Respect of Inter-country
Adoption, Israel was forced to amend the law. Israel could not be a
good-standing member of international conventions governing adoption policy if
conversion to Judaism – including the immersion of the adoptee (usually a minor)
in a mikve and circumcision (for boys) – remained a condition for
adoption.
Unfortunately, the amendment, made in 1996, was restricted to
cases of inter-country adoptions. In other cases of adoption, the requirement
remains that the adopter and the adoptee be of the same religion.
This
has created enormous hardship. For instance, if an Israeli Jew marries a
non-Jewish Israeli woman – say one of about 300,000 immigrants from the former
Soviet Union who is not Jewish according to Halacha – if she has non-Jewish
children from a previous marriage, they cannot be adopted by the Jewish
father.
Or, if an infertile Jewish couple decides to have a child via a
non-Jewish surrogate mother outside Israel (in Israel only Jewish women can be
surrogates), this child cannot be adopted. That’s because according to some
halachic opinions a child born to a non-Jewish woman is a non-Jew even if the
sperm and the egg were provided by Jews. And this was the position adopted by
the State of Israel. MK Nitzan Horowitz (Meretz) has proposed putting an end to
this absurd situation in which the people who effectively fill the role of
parents for their “adopted” children nevertheless lack the legal standing of
parents.
Horowitz, in cooperation with Irit Rosenblum of New Family, an
organization that promotes a separation of religion and state, has proposed a
bill that would remove altogether the stipulation that “the adopter shall be of
the same religion as the adoptee.”
Admittedly, Horowitz’s bill, which was
slated to be discussed Sunday in the Ministerial Committee for Legislation, has
close to no chance of passing under the current political constellation. Even
the discussion has been postponed after the Justice Ministry claimed that there
is a special legal committee currently reviewing the whole issue of
adoption.
But adopting Horowitz’s amendment is the right thing to
do.
When conversion becomes a condition for adoption, inevitably pressure
is brought to bear against the rabbinical conversion court judges to make the
conversion process more lenient, thus violating these judges’ religious
autonomy. And when secular parents are expected to convert their child as part
of the adoption process they are inevitably also put under pressure to put on a
show for the rabbinic conversion court as though they were leading a religious
lifestyle – observing Shabbat, eating kosher food, attending synagogue – when in
reality they have no religious sentiments whatsoever.
Religious faith
should not be a precondition for adopting a child, rather economic and
psychological stability and – above all – large quantities of love should
be.
At the same time, rabbis should not be expected to introduce
leniencies to their interpretation of “who is a Jew” in order to accommodate
secular parents interested in adopting a child.
The time has come to
separate religion from the adoption process.